BASH. Tom Thistlethwaite shared a post.
August 14 at 10:10 AM ·
binary file. {bin.zfind any thing that loads swag̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅## assembly, using recursive qbash.0 +++++++++++++How does one disprove the third law of thermodynamics?
Follow · 2{sudo{ui.c x}} \ in Q! { - }} where * means {F {Z}""::: A. [complex conjugate. {\ displaystyle Y {+ conjugate field} {\ displaystyle \ phi { - } =(\ varphi {+}){}} {\ displaystyle \ phi { - } =(\ varphi {+}){}} } The {\ displaystyle Y {+}} scalar potential is mapped to a field in the {\ displaystyle Y { - }} {\ displaystyle Y { - }} manifold, and vice versa, ie a conjugate field {\ displaystyle \ phi { +} = Manifold. In mathematics, if f(z) is a holomorphic function limited to real numbers, it has a complex conjugate property of f(z)=f(z), {XER}}}. All four known fundamental forces of force are mediated by the field. In the standard model of particle physics, this is produced by the exchange of gauge bosons. Specifically, the four basic interactions to be unified are: strong interactions: responsible for the formation of hadrons together with quarks, and the interaction of neutrons and protons to form a nucleus. The exchange particles that mediate this force are gluons. Electromagnetic interaction: A familiar interaction that acts on charged particles. Photons are exchange particles of this force. Weak interaction: A short-range interaction responsible for some form of radioactivity, acting on electrons, neutrinos, and quarks. It is mediated by W and Z bosons. Gravitational interaction: A long-range attractive interaction that acts on all particles. The assumed exchange particles are called gravitational forces. Modern unified field theory attempts to integrate these four interactions into a single framework. Display = svg.gloss.exe bash
The conflict is resolved as follows: At a certain temperature, the quantum nature of matter begins to dominate behavior. Closing the particles follows the Fermi-Dirac statistic, and Bose particles follow the Bose-Einstein statistic. Heat capacity at low temperatures in both cases is no longer Temperature independent, and is therefore no longer Entropy indepedent.
Request
1
P{bean.j}f={\frac {|\Theta {{cw}}|}{T{{c}}}}

where
Θ
c
w
\Theta {{cw}} is the Curie-Weiss temperature and
T
c
T{c} is the temperature below which magnetic order begins to develop.

One of the most direct evidence for absence of magnetic ordering give NMR or µSR experiments. If there is a local magnetic field present, the nuclear or muon spin would be affected which can be measured. 1H-NMR measurements [4] on κ-(BEDT-TTF)2Cu2(CN)3 have shown no sign of magnetic ordering down to 32 mK, which is four orders of magnitude smaller than the coupling constant J≈250 K[22] between neighboring spins in this compound. Further investigations include:

Specific heat measurements give information about the low-energy density of states, which can be compared to theoretical models.
Thermal transport measurements can determine if excitations are localized or itinerant.
Neutron scattering gives information about the nature of excitations and correlations (e.g. spinons).
Reflectance measurements can uncover spinons, which couple via emergent gauge fields to the electromagnetic field, giving rise to a power-law optical conductivity.[23]

Herbertsmithite, the mineral whose ground state was shown to have QSL behaviour
Observation of fractionalization[edit]
In 2012, Young Lee and his collaborators at MIT and the National Institute of Standards and Technology artificially developed a crystal of herbertsmithite, a crystal with kagome lattice ordering, on which they were able to perform neutron scattering experiments.[24] Earlier neutron scattering studies on powder samples had already reported evidence for gapless spinons in herbertsmithite.[25] The experiments of Lee and coworkers revealed evidence for spin-state fractionalization, a predicted property of quantum spin-liquid type states.[26] The observation has been described as a hallmark for the quantum spin liquid state in herbertsmithite.[27] Data indicate that a strongly correlated quantum spin liquid, a specific form of quantum spin liquid, is realized in Herbertsmithite.[28]

Strongly correlated quantum spin liquid[edit]
Strongly correlated quantum spin liquid (SCQSL) is a specific realization of a possible quantum spin liquid (QSL)[2][29] representing a new type of strongly correlated electrical insulator (SCI) that possesses properties of heavy fermion metals[30][31] with one exception: it resists the flow of electric charge. At low temperatures T the specific heat of this type of insulator is proportional to Tn with n less or equal 1 rather than n=3, as it should be in the case of a conventional insulator when the heat capacity is proportional to T3. When a magnetic field B is applied to SCI the specific heat depends strongly on B, contrary to conventional insulators. There are a few candidates of SCI; the most promising among them is Herbertsmithite, a mineral with chemical structure ZnCu3(OH)6Cl2.

Specific properties[edit]

Fig. 1: T-dependence of the electronic specific heat C/T of YbRh2Si2 at different magnetic fields [32] as shown in the legend. The values of (C/T)max and Tmax at B=8 Tesla are shown. The maximum (C/T)max decreases with growing magnetic field B, while Tmax shifts to higher T reaching 14 K at B=18 Tesla. Observing that C/TχM*, one concludes that SCQSL in ZnCu3(OH)6Cl2 shown in Fig. 2 exhibits the similar behavior as heavy fermions in YbRh2Si2.

Fig.2: T-dependence of the magnetic susceptibility χ at different magnetic fields for ZnCu3(OH)6Cl2.[33] The values of χmax and Tmax at B=7 Tesla are shown. T-dependence T(-2/3) at B=0 is depicted by the solid curve. The maximum χmax(T) decreases as magnetic field B grows, while Tmax(B) shifts to higher T reaching 15 K at B=14 Tesla. Observing that χC/TM*, one concludes that the specific heat of YbRh2Si2 shown in Fig. 1 exhibits the similar behavior as χ does. Thus, SCQSL in ZnCu3(OH)6Cl2 behaves as heavy fermions in YbRh2Si2.[34]
Exotic SCQSL's are formed with such hypothetical particles as fermionic spinons carrying spin 1/2 and no charge. The experimental studies of Herbertsmithite ZnCu3(OH)6Cl2 single crystal have found no evidence of long range magnetic order or spin freezing indicating that Herbertsmithite is the promising system to investigate SCQSL. The planes of the Cu2+ ions can be considered as two-dimensional layers with negligible magnetic interactions along the third dimension. Experiments have found neither long range magnetic order nor glassy spin freezing down to temperature 50 mK[33][35] making Herbertsmithite the best candidate for QSL realization. Frustration of a simple kagome lattice leads to dispersionless topologically protected flat bands.[36][37] In that case fermion condensation quantum phase transition (FCQPT)[38] can be considered as quantum critical point (QCP) of Herbertsmithite. FCQPT creates SCQSL composed of chargeless fermions with spin=1/2 occupying the corresponding Fermi sphere with a finite Fermi momentum. Herbertsmithite's thermodynamic and relaxation properties are similar to those of heavy fermion metals and two-dimensional 3He.[38] The key features of the findings are the presence in Herbertsmithite of spin–charge separation and SCQSL formed with itinerant spinons. Herbertsmithite represents a fascinating example of SCI where particles-spinons, non-existing as free, replace the initial particles appearing in the Hamiltonian and define the thermodynamic and relaxation properties at low temperatures. Because of the spin-charge separation, heat transport, thermodynamic and relaxation properties at low temperatures of the SCI Herbertsmithite are similar to those of heavy-fermion metals rather than of insulators.[34][39]
You asked this question. Request Answers:
Jess H. Brewer
Jess H. Brewer, Professor Emeritus, Dept. of Physics & Astronomy, Univ. of British Columbia
7,488 Answers in Physics
Michael R. Donohoe
Michael R. Donohoe, works at Alibi Weely Newspaper
24 Answers in Physics
Radhakrishnamurty Padyala
Radhakrishnamurty Padyala, former Retired Scientist
233 Answers in Thermodynamics
Malcolm Shute
Keith Allpress
Ali Abdulla
View More or Search
You've written an answer
You can edit or delete it at any time.
2 Answers
Tom Thistlethwaite
Tom Thistlethwaite, BA incomplete History and Philosophy of Science & Natural Sciences, University of Cambridge (2009)
Answered May 26
"It is impossible by any procedure, no matter how idealized, to reduce the temperature of any system to zero temperature in a finite number of finite operations".[10] The reason that T=0 cannot be reached according to the third law is explained as follows: Suppose that the temperature of a substance can be reduced in an isentropic process by changing the parameter X from X2 to X1. One can think of a multistage nuclear demagnetization setup where a magnetic field is switched on and off in a controlled way.[11] If there were an entropy difference at absolute zero, T=0 could be reached in a finite number of steps. However, at T=0 there is no entropy difference so an infinite number of steps would be needed. The process is illustrated in Fig.1.

Uniting General Relativity and Quantum MechanicsThistlethwaite's conjecture + proofs {as a challenge to the Third Law of Thermodynamics in the Quantum Dimension}: Order itself [eg. The perfect crystalline microscopic state] has a positive directionality that tends to smooth rather than rough. Electromagnetic and gravity intersect each other in a virtual dimension. Gravity pulls mass inwards through the Higgs field, while polarity (positive or negative, which is irrelevant), electromagneticity[Electrostrongweak] pushes mass outwards

&#QED

The third law of thermodynamics is sometimes stated as follows, regarding the properties of systems in equilibrium at absolute zero temperature: The entropy of a perfect crystal at absolute zero is exactly equal to zero. At absolute zero (zero kelvin), the system must be in a state with the minimum possible energy, and the above statement of the third law holds true provided that the perfect crystal has only one minimum energy state. Entropy is related to the number of accessible microstates, and for a system consisting of many particles, quantum mechanics indicates that there is only one unique state (called the ground state) with minimum energy.[1] If the system does not have a well-defined order (if its order is glassy, for example), then in practice there will remain some finite entropy as the system is brought to very low temperatures as the system becomes locked into a configuration with non-minimal energy. The constant value is called the residual entropy of the system.[2]

The Nernst–Simon statement of the third law of thermodynamics concerns thermodynamic processes at a fixed, low temperature: The entropy change associated with any condensed system undergoing a reversible isothermal process approaches zero as the temperature at which it is performed approaches 0 K. Here a condensed system refers to liquids and solids. A classical formulation by Nernst (actually a consequence of the Third Law) is: It is impossible for any process, no matter how idealized, to reduce the entropy of a system to its absolute-zero value in a finite number of operations.[4][5]{Disproven by Thistlethwaite 2018} There also exists a formulation of the Third Law which approaches the subject by postulating a specific energy behavior: If the composite of two thermodynamic systems constitutes an isolated system, then any energy exchange in any form between those two systems is bounded.[6] system does not have a well-defined order (if its order is glassy, for example), then in practice there will remain some finite entropy as the system is brought to very low temperatures as the system becomes locked into a configuration with non-minimal energy. The constant value is called the residual entropy of the system.[2] The Nernst–Simon statement of the third law of thermodynamics concerns thermodynamic processes at a fixed, low temperature: The entropy change associated with any condensed system undergoing a reversible isothermal process approaches zero as the temperature at which it is performed approaches 0 K. Here a condensed system refers to liquids and solids.

Quod Erat Demonstrandum
295 Views · View Upvoters · View Sharers
3 Upvotes
Share · 2

RecommendedAll
Tom Thistlethwaite

Tom Thistlethwaite
Tom Thistlethwaite
May 26
I understand that objects can have negative mass and that colour charge can exist as positive values over groups and sets.

...(more)
Reply

Tom Thistlethwaite
Tom Thistlethwaite
Jun 1

Language:

Editor: Layout:

1

--GNAT 4.9.3

2

3

with Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Text_IO;

4

procedure Hello is

5

begin

6

Put_Line ("Hello, world!");

-bash: !": event not found

7

end Hello;

8

JS fractals fibs. Zzz!???? Fractal!££££ Bash!!!!! b
Reply

Tom Thistlethwaite
Tom Thistlethwaite
Jul 25
The conflict is resolved as follows: At a certain temperature the quantum nature of matter starts to dominate the behavior. Close particles follow Fermi-Dirac statistics and Bose particles follow Bose-Einstein statistics. In both cases the heat capacity at low temperatures is no longer temperature independent, even for ideal gases. For Fermi gasesCV in Eq. (4), which yields

{\ displaystyle S (T, V) = S (T_ {0}, V) + {\ frac {3} {2}} R \ ln {\ frac {T} {T_ {0}}}.} S ( T, V) = S (T_0, V) + \ fr and {3} {2} R \ ln \ frac {T} {T_0}. (13)
lookingforsomehope1
1 point ·
4 days agoSl (T) is the entropy of the liquid and x is the gas fraction.

Clearly the entropy change during the liquid-gas transition (x from 0 to 1) diverges in the limit of T → 0.

This violates Eq. (8).

Nature solves this paradox as follows: at temperatures below about 50 mK the vapor pressure is so low that the gas density is lower than the best vacuum in the universe.

In other words: below 50 mK there is simply no gas above the liquid.

bash.js.io9
Reply

}
Zsh. C- unix.like shell-A&{QED! ++! ++! +! +! +! +! + _! + _! + _! + _! + _! + _! + _ + _ ### ##¢¢##¢¢∞#∞¢#¢∞##¢∞∞¢¢∞#¢#∞#¢∞BOOLEAN&guardnode.01. #
Java.vm {public.static.bean.j ^ &&&&& 9&QED(-1)
Ring0)Z,
Chown.exe + SUBEJECTIVE C ======&QED ^^^^^^ && ^^&^&^&^ &&& ^^ && ^&}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}} \ sudo bash!
] [] [[]] [] [] [[]] [] [] [00000
Let x0αsin(χ/α)sinh(t /α)coshξ,x {0} = \ alpha \ sin(\ chi / \ alpha)\ sinh(t / \ alpha)\ cosh \ xi ,x1αcos (χ/α), x {1} = \ alpha \ cos(\ chi / \ alpha),x2αsin(χ/α)cosh(t /α),x {2 } = \ alpha \ sin(\ chi / \ alpha)\ cosh(t / \ alpha),xiαzisin(χ/α)sinh(t /α)sinhξ,3≤i≤nx{i } = \ alpha z {i} \ sin(\ Chi / \ alpha)\ sinh(t / \ alpha)\ sinh \ xi,\ qquad 3 \ leq i \ leq n where ziz {i} describes a S n - 3 S {{n-3}}. Then the metric reads: ds 2d χ 2+ sin2  (χ / α) dsd S, α, n - 1 2, ds {2} = d \ chi {2} + \ sin {2} (\ chi / \ alpha)ds _ {{dS,\ alpha,n-1}} {2}, where dsd S,α,n - 1 2 - dt 2 +α2sinh2(t /α)d H n - 2 2 ds {{dS,\ Alpha,n-1}} {2} = - dt {2} + \ alpha {2} \ sinh {2}(t / \ alpha)dH {{n-2}} {2} is in open slice coordinates A measure of the n - 1 n-1 dimensional de Sitter space of the radius of curvature α\alpha. The hyperbolic metric is given by: d H n - 2 2d ξ 2+ sinh2 ξ dΩn - 3 2 . dH {{n-2}} {2} = d \ xi {2} + \ sinh {2} \ xi d \ Omega {{n-3}} {2}. This is (t, ξ, θ, φ1, φ2, ⋯, φn - 3) → (iχ, ξ, it, θ, φ1, ⋯, φn - the analytical continuation of the open slice coordinates - 4) (t, \ Xi,\ theta,\ phi _ {1},\ phi _ {2},\ cdots,\ phi _ {{n-3}})\ to(i \ chi,\ xi,it ,\ theta,\ phi _ {1}, \ cdots, \ phi _ {{n-4}}) and also switch x 0 x {0} and x 2 x {2} because they change their time/same space properties. }}}}}
[.shell.x11 {#THE FRACTAL MULTIVERSE! . #E PLURIBUS #UNUM QUANTUM!
(I guess: C +++ JS# 万物论#.{Can infinite small particles produce negative mass?{How do you expel the third law of thermodynamics?} ++ J ^ qed ++ Therefore, in scalar potential, the effect is static projection And communicate from their reciprocal opponents, such as the following conjugate pair {BEAN.Js} if E = mc ^ square
However S = E / k (where k is the boundary field of the open state) {in other words {
For many programs, the temperature of any system can be reduced to zero temperature in a limited number of limited operations. The third law states that absolute 0 is not absolute, since entropy (S) must always be greater or less than 0. because S = E / k where k is a possible microscopic number (ie E = mc ^ 2) infinity of the p-adic limit . } if and ONLY if. 1dsudo(bash.exe C ++&qed£################################################### ####
Then through the differential calculation, E = EcS
Energy = Energy * 2.99 .... x10 ^ 8 ms ^ -1 {{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{ {{{{{{{{{{{{}} J ^ qed ++ Therefore, under scalar potential, the effect is static projection to and from its reciprocal opponent, as in the following conjugate pair ++ C +++ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +++++++++++++++ x}} \ in Q! { - }} where * means {F {Z}""::: A. [complex conjugate. {\ displaystyle Y {+ conjugate field} {\ displaystyle \ phi { - } =(\ varphi {+}){}} {\ displaystyle \ phi { - } =(\ varphi {+}){}} } The {\ displaystyle Y {+}} scalar potential is mapped to a field in the {\ displaystyle Y { - }} {\ displaystyle Y { - }} manifold, and vice versa, ie a conjugate field {\ displaystyle \ phi { +} = Manifold. In mathematics, if f(z) is a holomorphic function limited to real numbers, it has a complex conjugate property of f(z)=f(z), {XER}}}. All four known fundamental forces of force are mediated by the field. In the standard model of particle physics, this is produced by the exchange of gauge bosons. Specifically, the four basic interactions to be unified are: strong interactions: responsible for the formation of hadrons together with quarks, and the interaction of neutrons and protons to form a nucleus. The exchange particles that mediate this force are gluons. Electromagnetic interaction: A familiar interaction that acts on charged particles. Photons are exchange particles of this force. Weak interaction: A short-range interaction responsible for some form of radioactivity, acting on electrons, neutrinos, and quarks. It is mediated by W and Z bosons. Gravitational interaction: A long-range attractive interaction that acts on all particles. The assumed exchange particles are called gravitational forces. Modern unified field theory attempts to integrate these four interactions into a single framework. Display = svg.gloss.exe bash
The conflict is resolved as follows: At a certain temperature, the quantum nature of matter begins to dominate behavior. Closing the particles follows the Fermi-Dirac statistic, and Bose particles follow the Bose-Einstein statistic. Heat capacity at low temperatures in both cases is no longer Temperature independent, and is therefore no longer Entropy indepedent.

Tom Thistlethwaite
August 14 at 9:19 AM
//gcc 5.0.4

#import <Foundation/Foundation.h>

GNU bash, version 4.3.46
±±±!@±!±!@±$±!!#$@!@#$!#@$!#$@!#$@!#$#$!@!#@$!#@@#$@#$$#@$##$%^^%$#®∑£∞¢£¢∞£¢∞£¢∞£¢∞∞£¢435¢∞¢∞§¢∞¶¢∞¶§∞∞§¶∞§¶∞¨¥¥†®®†¥†¥®
{
public class Program
€жℓɨ˅€-βɨɲ' ring0&
{JAVA}.c(compiler.vm.io£lyra2.salt.i This is why you dont feed the animals, that sleep inside Tom Thistlethwaite's Head.£ CUCKERBERG>COM
£££££££√https://www.facebook.com/…/www.f…/help/ajax/report_a_problem I HAVE PROBLEM CUCKERBERG!!! Cuckerberg
cuckerberg.= cuck=true=1
fuckerberg =zuck = true=1
This poll ends in 6 days
4 CommentsBirthday Thread (23.07.18)
Age = 29
Z.sh.bash.zsh
1 Comment
1Tom Thistlethwaite
Like
Comment
Share
Comments
Tom Thistlethwaite
Tom Thistlethwaite Birthday Thread (23.07.18)
Age = 29
Z.sh.bash.zsh
147 Comments1 Share
1Tom Thistlethwaite
Love
Comment
Share
Comments
Tom Thistlethwaite
Tom Thistlethwaite
GIPHY
Manage
Like · Reply · 3w
Tom Thistlethwaite
Tom Thistlethwaite Bash.{
Manage
Like · Reply · 3w
Tom Thistlethwaite
Tom Thistlethwaite Grand Unified Theory The usual theory of inflation breaks down in eternal inflation. We derive a dual description of eternal inflation in terms of a deformed Euclidean CFT located at the threshold of eternal inflation. The partition function gives the …See More
Manage
Like · Reply · 3w
Tom Thistlethwaite
Tom Thistlethwaite How does one disprove the third law of thermodynamics?
Follow · 2
Request…See More
Manage
Like · Reply · 3w
Tom Thistlethwaite
Tom Thistlethwaite Uniting General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics
Paradox, Conjecture and then proof by contradiction.
Einsteins theory of General Relativity holds true at all scales. On a base level this is true:
That the speed of light c, is constant.
That information can travel faster than c
The Third Law of Thermodynamics in the Quantum Dimension}:----
Order itself [eg. The perfect crystalline microscopic state] has a positive directionality that tends to smooth rather than rough.
My proof is via the 3rd Law of Thermodynamics. Which states the following.
In an isolated system of 3 units, the 0th Law states that all systems must be in harmony with each other.
S= k ln(omega) & E= mc^2
Th = bT, when b < 1, the thermodynamic equilibrium can be ensured in the fractal universe by appropriate selection of the fractal parameter β.
&
QED
Manage
Like · Reply · 3w
Tom Thistlethwaite
Tom Thistlethwaite ...
The Generalised Third law of Thermodynamics in the Quantum Dimension .auth....Tom Thistlethwaite
In words, although mathematically at T=0 the entropy (S) of a perfect crystal is 0, a crystal is never perfect, because each action must be the result of a previous action (i.e. the conservation of momentum at Quantum scales.) So there is a sense in which the third law must NEVER be true, as perfect order requires stasis, or fixation of all fields. Either the big bang occurred as a result of a collapse of matter in a parent universe, or a partial and repeated contraction, S (entropy) is NEVER = 0.
In other words: at absolute zero all isothermal processes are isentropic.
3: Classically, one is free to choose the zero of the entropy.... and [zero x1] can be different to [zero x2]
It is my belief that we exist INSIDE a black hole, but the relevance of this is limited, because:

the event horizon is 13.8 billion years away
-no meaningful messages can be transferred through the event horizon, by definition. Although information cannot be deleted, our messages would never escape the black hole that we possibly live in.
That being said, the mathematical formulation of the Third Law of Thermodynamics is below:
1: In the limit T0→0 the integral in Eq.(4) is finite.[clarification needed] So that we may take T0=0 and write
S ( T , X ) = S ( 0 , X ) + ∫ 0 T C ( T ′ , X ) T ′ d T ′ . {\displaystyle S(T,X)=S(0,X)+\int _{0}^{T}{\frac {C(T^{\prime },X)}{T^{\prime }}}\mathrm {d} T^{\prime }.} S(T,X)=S(0,X) + \int_0^T \frac {C(T^\prime,X)}{T^\prime}\mathrm{d}T^\prime. (5)
The value of S(0,X) is independent of X.[clarification needed] In mathematical form
S ( 0 , X ) = S ( 0 ) . {\displaystyle S(0,X)=S(0).} S(0,X) = S(0). (6)
So Eq.(5) can be further simplified to
S ( T , X ) = S ( 0 ) + ∫ 0 T C ( T ′ , X ) T ′ d T ′ . {\displaystyle S(T,X)=S(0)+\int {0}^{T}{\frac {C(T^{\prime },X)}{T^{\prime }}}\mathrm {d} T^{\prime }.} S(T,X)=S(0) + \int_0^T \frac {C(T^\prime,X)}{T^\prime}\mathrm{d}T^\prime. (7)
Equation (6) can also be formulated as
lim T → 0 ( ∂ S ( T , X ) ∂ X ) T = 0. {\displaystyle \lim {T\rightarrow 0}\left({\frac {\partial S(T,X)}{\partial X}}\right){T}=0.} \lim{T \rightarrow 0}\left( \frac { \part S(T,X)}{ \part X}\right)T = 0. (8)
In words: at absolute zero all isothermal processes are isentropic. Eq.(8) is the mathematical formulation of the third law.
3: Classically, one is free to choose the zero of the entropy, and it is convenient to take
S ( 0 ) = 0 {\displaystyle S(0)=0} S(0)=0 (9)
so that Eq.(7) reduces to the final form
S ( T , X ) = ∫ 0 T C ( T ′ , X ) T ′ d T ′ . {\displaystyle S(T,X)=\int {0}^{T}{\frac {C(T^{\prime },X)}{T^{\prime }}}\mathrm {d} T^{\prime }.} S(T,X) = \int_0^T \frac {C(T^\prime,X)}{T^\prime}\mathrm{d}T^\prime. (10)
However, reinterpreting Eq. (9) in view of the quantized nature of the lowest-lying energy states, the physical meaning of Eq.(9) goes deeper than just a convenient selection of the zero of the entropy. It is due to the perfect order at zero kelvin as explained above.
A p-adic number is an extension of the field of rationals such that congruences modulo powers of a fixed prime p are related to proximity in the so called "p-adic metric."
Any nonzero rational number x can be represented by
x=(p^ar)/s,
(1)
where p is a prime number, r and s are integers not divisible by p, and a is a unique integer. Then define the p-adic norm of x by
|x|p=p^(-a).
(2)
Also define the p-adic norm
|0|p=0.
(3)T
Manage
Like · Reply · 3w
Tom Thistlethwaite
Tom Thistlethwaite The conflict is resolved as follows: At a certain temperature the quantum nature of matter starts to dominate the behavior. Fermi particles follow Fermi–Dirac statistics and Bose particles follow Bose–Einstein statistics.CV in Eq. (4), which yields
{\displaystyle S(T,V)=S(T{0},V)+{\frac {3}{2}}R\ln {\frac {T}{T{0}}}.} S(T,V) = S(T_0,V) + \frac{3}{2}R \ln \frac{T}{T_0}. (13) In the limit T0 → 0 this expression diverges, again contradicting the third law of thermodynamics.
The conflict is resolved as follows: At a certain temperature the quantum nature of matter starts to dominate the behavior. Fermi particles follow Fermi–Dirac statistics and Bose particles follow Bose–Einstein statistics. In both cases the heat capacity at low temperatures is no longer temperature independent, even for ideal gases. For Fermi gasesCV in Eq. (4), which yields
{\displaystyle S(T,V)=S(T{0},V)+{\frac {3}{2}}R\ln {\frac {T}{T{0}}}.} S(T,V) = S(T_0,V) + \frac{3}{2}R \ln \frac{T}{T_0}. (13)
lookingforsomehope1
1 point ·
4 days ago
There also exists a formulation of the Third Law which approaches the subject by postulating a specific energy behavior: If the composite of two thermodynamic systems constitutes an isolated system, then any energy exchange in any form between those two systems is bounded.[6]
+++ with many programs....
1
Manage
Like · Reply · 3w
Tom Thistlethwaite
Tom Thistlethwaite THIS! RIGHT HERE!
Like
Comment
Share
Comments
Tom Thistlethwaite
Tom Thistlethwaite Darren Harold Acaster = im struggle to chose
Manage
Like · Reply · 2m
Tom Thistlethwaite
Tom Thistlethwaite *choose
Manage
Like · Reply · 2m
Tom Thistlethwaite
Tom Thistlethwaite https://www.facebook.com/help/ajax/report_a_problem
Manage
FACEBOOK.COM
Facebook
Like · Reply · Remove Preview · 2m
Tom Thistlethwaite
Tom Thistlethwaite vhttps://www.facebook.com/help/ajax/report_a_problemhttps://www.facebook.com/help/ajax/report_a_problemhttps://www.facebook.com/help/ajax/report_a_problemhttps://www.facebook.com/help/ajax/report_a_problemhttps://www.facebook.com/help/ajax/report_a_problemhttps://www.facebook.com/help/ajax/report_a_problemhttps://www.facebook.com/help/ajax/report_a_problemhttps://www.facebook.com/help/ajax/report_a_problemhttps://www.facebook.com/help/ajax/report_a_problemhttps://www.facebook.com/help/ajax/report_a_problemhttps://www.facebook.com/help/ajax/report_a_problemhttps://www.facebook.com/help/ajax/report_a_problemhttps://www.facebook.com/help/ajax/report_a_problemhttps://www.facebook.com/help/ajax/report_a_problemhttps://www.facebook.com/help/ajax/report_a_problemhttps://www.facebook.com/help/ajax/report_a_problemhttps://www.facebook.com/help/ajax/report_a_problemhttps://www.facebook.com/help/ajax/report_a_problemhttps://www.facebook.com/help/ajax/report_a_problemhttps://www.facebook.com/help/ajax/report_a_problemhttps://www.facebook.com/help/ajax/report_a_problem
Manage
Like · Reply · 1m

> `_FACEBOOK.COM**BASH. Tom Thistlethwaite shared a post.
August 14 at 10:10 AM ·
binary file. {bin.zfind any thing that loads swag̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅## assembly, using recursive qbash.0 +++++++++++++How does one disprove the third law of thermodynamics?
Follow · 2{sudo{ui.c x}} \ in Q! { - }} where * means {F {Z}""::: A. [complex conjugate. {\ displaystyle Y {+ conjugate field} {\ displaystyle \ phi { - } =(\ varphi {+}){}} {\ displaystyle \ phi { - } =(\ varphi {+}){}} } The {\ displaystyle Y {+}} scalar potential is mapped to a field in the {\ displaystyle Y { - }} {\ displaystyle Y { - }} manifold, and vice versa, ie a conjugate field {\ displaystyle \ phi { +} = Manifold. In mathematics, if f(z) is a holomorphic function limited to real numbers, it has a complex conjugate property of f(z)=f(z), {XER}}}. All four known fundamental forces of force are mediated by the field. In the standard model of particle physics, this is produced by the exchange of gauge bosons. Specifically, the four basic interactions to be unified are: strong interactions: responsible for the formation of hadrons together with quarks, and the interaction of neutrons and protons to form a nucleus. The exchange particles that mediate this force are gluons. Electromagnetic interaction: A familiar interaction that acts on charged particles. Photons are exchange particles of this force. Weak interaction: A short-range interaction responsible for some form of radioactivity, acting on electrons, neutrinos, and quarks. It is mediated by W and Z bosons. Gravitational interaction: A long-range attractive interaction that acts on all particles. The assumed exchange particles are called gravitational forces. Modern unified field theory attempts to integrate these four interactions into a single framework. Display = svg.gloss.exe bash
The conflict is resolved as follows: At a certain temperature, the quantum nature of matter begins to dominate behavior. Closing the particles follows the Fermi-Dirac statistic, and Bose particles follow the Bose-Einstein statistic. Heat capacity at low temperatures in both cases is no longer Temperature independent, and is therefore no longer Entropy indepedent.
Request
1
P{bean.j}f={\frac {|\Theta {{cw}}|}{T{{c}}}}

where
Θ
c
w
\Theta {{cw}} is the Curie-Weiss temperature and
T
c
T{c} is the temperature below which magnetic order begins to develop.

One of the most direct evidence for absence of magnetic ordering give NMR or µSR experiments. If there is a local magnetic field present, the nuclear or muon spin would be affected which can be measured. 1H-NMR measurements [4] on κ-(BEDT-TTF)2Cu2(CN)3 have shown no sign of magnetic ordering down to 32 mK, which is four orders of magnitude smaller than the coupling constant J≈250 K[22] between neighboring spins in this compound. Further investigations include:

Specific heat measurements give information about the low-energy density of states, which can be compared to theoretical models.
Thermal transport measurements can determine if excitations are localized or itinerant.
Neutron scattering gives information about the nature of excitations and correlations (e.g. spinons).
Reflectance measurements can uncover spinons, which couple via emergent gauge fields to the electromagnetic field, giving rise to a power-law optical conductivity.[23]

Herbertsmithite, the mineral whose ground state was shown to have QSL behaviour
Observation of fractionalization[edit]
In 2012, Young Lee and his collaborators at MIT and the National Institute of Standards and Technology artificially developed a crystal of herbertsmithite, a crystal with kagome lattice ordering, on which they were able to perform neutron scattering experiments.[24] Earlier neutron scattering studies on powder samples had already reported evidence for gapless spinons in herbertsmithite.[25] The experiments of Lee and coworkers revealed evidence for spin-state fractionalization, a predicted property of quantum spin-liquid type states.[26] The observation has been described as a hallmark for the quantum spin liquid state in herbertsmithite.[27] Data indicate that a strongly correlated quantum spin liquid, a specific form of quantum spin liquid, is realized in Herbertsmithite.[28]

Strongly correlated quantum spin liquid[edit]
Strongly correlated quantum spin liquid (SCQSL) is a specific realization of a possible quantum spin liquid (QSL)[2][29] representing a new type of strongly correlated electrical insulator (SCI) that possesses properties of heavy fermion metals[30][31] with one exception: it resists the flow of electric charge. At low temperatures T the specific heat of this type of insulator is proportional to Tn with n less or equal 1 rather than n=3, as it should be in the case of a conventional insulator when the heat capacity is proportional to T3. When a magnetic field B is applied to SCI the specific heat depends strongly on B, contrary to conventional insulators. There are a few candidates of SCI; the most promising among them is Herbertsmithite, a mineral with chemical structure ZnCu3(OH)6Cl2.

Specific properties[edit]

Fig. 1: T-dependence of the electronic specific heat C/T of YbRh2Si2 at different magnetic fields [32] as shown in the legend. The values of (C/T)max and Tmax at B=8 Tesla are shown. The maximum (C/T)max decreases with growing magnetic field B, while Tmax shifts to higher T reaching 14 K at B=18 Tesla. Observing that C/TχM*, one concludes that SCQSL in ZnCu3(OH)6Cl2 shown in Fig. 2 exhibits the similar behavior as heavy fermions in YbRh2Si2.

Fig.2: T-dependence of the magnetic susceptibility χ at different magnetic fields for ZnCu3(OH)6Cl2.[33] The values of χmax and Tmax at B=7 Tesla are shown. T-dependence T(-2/3) at B=0 is depicted by the solid curve. The maximum χmax(T) decreases as magnetic field B grows, while Tmax(B) shifts to higher T reaching 15 K at B=14 Tesla. Observing that χC/TM*, one concludes that the specific heat of YbRh2Si2 shown in Fig. 1 exhibits the similar behavior as χ does. Thus, SCQSL in ZnCu3(OH)6Cl2 behaves as heavy fermions in YbRh2Si2.[34]
Exotic SCQSL's are formed with such hypothetical particles as fermionic spinons carrying spin 1/2 and no charge. The experimental studies of Herbertsmithite ZnCu3(OH)6Cl2 single crystal have found no evidence of long range magnetic order or spin freezing indicating that Herbertsmithite is the promising system to investigate SCQSL. The planes of the Cu2+ ions can be considered as two-dimensional layers with negligible magnetic interactions along the third dimension. Experiments have found neither long range magnetic order nor glassy spin freezing down to temperature 50 mK[33][35] making Herbertsmithite the best candidate for QSL realization. Frustration of a simple kagome lattice leads to dispersionless topologically protected flat bands.[36][37] In that case fermion condensation quantum phase transition (FCQPT)[38] can be considered as quantum critical point (QCP) of Herbertsmithite. FCQPT creates SCQSL composed of chargeless fermions with spin=1/2 occupying the corresponding Fermi sphere with a finite Fermi momentum. Herbertsmithite's thermodynamic and relaxation properties are similar to those of heavy fermion metals and two-dimensional 3He.[38] The key features of the findings are the presence in Herbertsmithite of spin–charge separation and SCQSL formed with itinerant spinons. Herbertsmithite represents a fascinating example of SCI where particles-spinons, non-existing as free, replace the initial particles appearing in the Hamiltonian and define the thermodynamic and relaxation properties at low temperatures. Because of the spin-charge separation, heat transport, thermodynamic and relaxation properties at low temperatures of the SCI Herbertsmithite are similar to those of heavy-fermion metals rather than of insulators.[34][39]
You asked this question. Request Answers:
Jess H. Brewer
Jess H. Brewer, Professor Emeritus, Dept. of Physics & Astronomy, Univ. of British Columbia
7,488 Answers in Physics
Michael R. Donohoe
Michael R. Donohoe, works at Alibi Weely Newspaper
24 Answers in Physics
Radhakrishnamurty Padyala
Radhakrishnamurty Padyala, former Retired Scientist
233 Answers in Thermodynamics
Malcolm Shute
Keith Allpress
Ali Abdulla
View More or Search
You've written an answer
You can edit or delete it at any time.
2 Answers
Tom Thistlethwaite
Tom Thistlethwaite, BA incomplete History and Philosophy of Science & Natural Sciences, University of Cambridge (2009)
Answered May 26
"It is impossible by any procedure, no matter how idealized, to reduce the temperature of any system to zero temperature in a finite number of finite operations".[10] The reason that T=0 cannot be reached according to the third law is explained as follows: Suppose that the temperature of a substance can be reduced in an isentropic process by changing the parameter X from X2 to X1. One can think of a multistage nuclear demagnetization setup where a magnetic field is switched on and off in a controlled way.[11] If there were an entropy difference at absolute zero, T=0 could be reached in a finite number of steps. However, at T=0 there is no entropy difference so an infinite number of steps would be needed. The process is illustrated in Fig.1.

Uniting General Relativity and Quantum MechanicsThistlethwaite's conjecture + proofs {as a challenge to the Third Law of Thermodynamics in the Quantum Dimension}: Order itself [eg. The perfect crystalline microscopic state] has a positive directionality that tends to smooth rather than rough. Electromagnetic and gravity intersect each other in a virtual dimension. Gravity pulls mass inwards through the Higgs field, while polarity (positive or negative, which is irrelevant), electromagneticity[Electrostrongweak] pushes mass outwards

&#QED

The third law of thermodynamics is sometimes stated as follows, regarding the properties of systems in equilibrium at absolute zero temperature: The entropy of a perfect crystal at absolute zero is exactly equal to zero. At absolute zero (zero kelvin), the system must be in a state with the minimum possible energy, and the above statement of the third law holds true provided that the perfect crystal has only one minimum energy state. Entropy is related to the number of accessible microstates, and for a system consisting of many particles, quantum mechanics indicates that there is only one unique state (called the ground state) with minimum energy.[1] If the system does not have a well-defined order (if its order is glassy, for example), then in practice there will remain some finite entropy as the system is brought to very low temperatures as the system becomes locked into a configuration with non-minimal energy. The constant value is called the residual entropy of the system.[2]

The Nernst–Simon statement of the third law of thermodynamics concerns thermodynamic processes at a fixed, low temperature: The entropy change associated with any condensed system undergoing a reversible isothermal process approaches zero as the temperature at which it is performed approaches 0 K. Here a condensed system refers to liquids and solids. A classical formulation by Nernst (actually a consequence of the Third Law) is: It is impossible for any process, no matter how idealized, to reduce the entropy of a system to its absolute-zero value in a finite number of operations.[4][5]{Disproven by Thistlethwaite 2018} There also exists a formulation of the Third Law which approaches the subject by postulating a specific energy behavior: If the composite of two thermodynamic systems constitutes an isolated system, then any energy exchange in any form between those two systems is bounded.[6] system does not have a well-defined order (if its order is glassy, for example), then in practice there will remain some finite entropy as the system is brought to very low temperatures as the system becomes locked into a configuration with non-minimal energy. The constant value is called the residual entropy of the system.[2] The Nernst–Simon statement of the third law of thermodynamics concerns thermodynamic processes at a fixed, low temperature: The entropy change associated with any condensed system undergoing a reversible isothermal process approaches zero as the temperature at which it is performed approaches 0 K. Here a condensed system refers to liquids and solids.

Quod Erat Demonstrandum
295 Views · View Upvoters · View Sharers
3 Upvotes
Share · 2

RecommendedAll
Tom Thistlethwaite

Tom Thistlethwaite
Tom Thistlethwaite
May 26
I understand that objects can have negative mass and that colour charge can exist as positive values over groups and sets.

...(more)
Reply

Tom Thistlethwaite
Tom Thistlethwaite
Jun 1

Language:

Editor: Layout:

1

--GNAT 4.9.3

2

3

with Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Text_IO;

4

procedure Hello is

5

begin

6

Put_Line ("Hello, world!");

-bash: !": event not found

7

end Hello;

8

JS fractals fibs. Zzz!???? Fractal!££££ Bash!!!!! b
Reply

Tom Thistlethwaite
Tom Thistlethwaite
Jul 25
The conflict is resolved as follows: At a certain temperature the quantum nature of matter starts to dominate the behavior. Close particles follow Fermi-Dirac statistics and Bose particles follow Bose-Einstein statistics. In both cases the heat capacity at low temperatures is no longer temperature independent, even for ideal gases. For Fermi gasesCV in Eq. (4), which yields

{\ displaystyle S (T, V) = S (T_ {0}, V) + {\ frac {3} {2}} R \ ln {\ frac {T} {T_ {0}}}.} S ( T, V) = S (T_0, V) + \ fr and {3} {2} R \ ln \ frac {T} {T_0}. (13)
lookingforsomehope1
1 point ·
4 days agoSl (T) is the entropy of the liquid and x is the gas fraction.

Clearly the entropy change during the liquid-gas transition (x from 0 to 1) diverges in the limit of T → 0.

This violates Eq. (8).

Nature solves this paradox as follows: at temperatures below about 50 mK the vapor pressure is so low that the gas density is lower than the best vacuum in the universe.

In other words: below 50 mK there is simply no gas above the liquid.

bash.js.io9
Reply

}
Zsh. C- unix.like shell-A&{QED! ++! ++! +! +! +! +! + _! + _! + _! + _! + _! + _! + _ + _ ### ##¢¢##¢¢∞#∞¢#¢∞##¢∞∞¢¢∞#¢#∞#¢∞BOOLEAN&guardnode.01. #
Java.vm {public.static.bean.j ^ &&&&& 9&QED(-1)
Ring0)Z,
Chown.exe + SUBEJECTIVE C ======&QED ^^^^^^ && ^^&^&^&^ &&& ^^ && ^&}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}} \ sudo bash!
] [] [[]] [] [] [[]] [] [] [00000
Let x0αsin(χ/α)sinh(t /α)coshξ,x {0} = \ alpha \ sin(\ chi / \ alpha)\ sinh(t / \ alpha)\ cosh \ xi ,x1αcos (χ/α), x {1} = \ alpha \ cos(\ chi / \ alpha),x2αsin(χ/α)cosh(t /α),x {2 } = \ alpha \ sin(\ chi / \ alpha)\ cosh(t / \ alpha),xiαzisin(χ/α)sinh(t /α)sinhξ,3≤i≤nx{i } = \ alpha z {i} \ sin(\ Chi / \ alpha)\ sinh(t / \ alpha)\ sinh \ xi,\ qquad 3 \ leq i \ leq n where ziz {i} describes a S n - 3 S {{n-3}}. Then the metric reads: ds 2d χ 2+ sin2  (χ / α) dsd S, α, n - 1 2, ds {2} = d \ chi {2} + \ sin {2} (\ chi / \ alpha)ds _ {{dS,\ alpha,n-1}} {2}, where dsd S,α,n - 1 2 - dt 2 +α2sinh2(t /α)d H n - 2 2 ds {{dS,\ Alpha,n-1}} {2} = - dt {2} + \ alpha {2} \ sinh {2}(t / \ alpha)dH {{n-2}} {2} is in open slice coordinates A measure of the n - 1 n-1 dimensional de Sitter space of the radius of curvature α\alpha. The hyperbolic metric is given by: d H n - 2 2d ξ 2+ sinh2 ξ dΩn - 3 2 . dH {{n-2}} {2} = d \ xi {2} + \ sinh {2} \ xi d \ Omega {{n-3}} {2}. This is (t, ξ, θ, φ1, φ2, ⋯, φn - 3) → (iχ, ξ, it, θ, φ1, ⋯, φn - the analytical continuation of the open slice coordinates - 4) (t, \ Xi,\ theta,\ phi _ {1},\ phi _ {2},\ cdots,\ phi _ {{n-3}})\ to(i \ chi,\ xi,it ,\ theta,\ phi _ {1}, \ cdots, \ phi _ {{n-4}}) and also switch x 0 x {0} and x 2 x {2} because they change their time/same space properties. }}}}}
[.shell.x11 {#THE FRACTAL MULTIVERSE! . #E PLURIBUS #UNUM QUANTUM!
(I guess: C +++ JS# 万物论#.{Can infinite small particles produce negative mass?{How do you expel the third law of thermodynamics?} ++ J ^ qed ++ Therefore, in scalar potential, the effect is static projection And communicate from their reciprocal opponents, such as the following conjugate pair {BEAN.Js} if E = mc ^ square
However S = E / k (where k is the boundary field of the open state) {in other words {
For many programs, the temperature of any system can be reduced to zero temperature in a limited number of limited operations. The third law states that absolute 0 is not absolute, since entropy (S) must always be greater or less than 0. because S = E / k where k is a possible microscopic number (ie E = mc ^ 2) infinity of the p-adic limit . } if and ONLY if. 1dsudo(bash.exe C ++&qed£################################################### ####
Then through the differential calculation, E = EcS
Energy = Energy * 2.99 .... x10 ^ 8 ms ^ -1 {{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{ {{{{{{{{{{{{}} J ^ qed ++ Therefore, under scalar potential, the effect is static projection to and from its reciprocal opponent, as in the following conjugate pair ++ C +++ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +++++++++++++++ x}} \ in Q! { - }} where * means {F {Z}""::: A. [complex conjugate. {\ displaystyle Y {+ conjugate field} {\ displaystyle \ phi { - } =(\ varphi {+}){}} {\ displaystyle \ phi { - } =(\ varphi {+}){}} } The {\ displaystyle Y {+}} scalar potential is mapped to a field in the {\ displaystyle Y { - }} {\ displaystyle Y { - }} manifold, and vice versa, ie a conjugate field {\ displaystyle \ phi { +} = Manifold. In mathematics, if f(z) is a holomorphic function limited to real numbers, it has a complex conjugate property of f(z)=f(z), {XER}}}. All four known fundamental forces of force are mediated by the field. In the standard model of particle physics, this is produced by the exchange of gauge bosons. Specifically, the four basic interactions to be unified are: strong interactions: responsible for the formation of hadrons together with quarks, and the interaction of neutrons and protons to form a nucleus. The exchange particles that mediate this force are gluons. Electromagnetic interaction: A familiar interaction that acts on charged particles. Photons are exchange particles of this force. Weak interaction: A short-range interaction responsible for some form of radioactivity, acting on electrons, neutrinos, and quarks. It is mediated by W and Z bosons. Gravitational interaction: A long-range attractive interaction that acts on all particles. The assumed exchange particles are called gravitational forces. Modern unified field theory attempts to integrate these four interactions into a single framework. Display = svg.gloss.exe bash
The conflict is resolved as follows: At a certain temperature, the quantum nature of matter begins to dominate behavior. Closing the particles follows the Fermi-Dirac statistic, and Bose particles follow the Bose-Einstein statistic. Heat capacity at low temperatures in both cases is no longer Temperature independent, and is therefore no longer Entropy indepedent.

Tom Thistlethwaite
August 14 at 9:19 AM
//gcc 5.0.4

#import <Foundation/Foundation.h>

GNU bash, version 4.3.46
±±±!@±!±!@±$±!!#$@!@#$!#@$!#$@!#$@!#$#$!@!#@$!#@@#$@#$$#@$##$%^^%$#®∑£∞¢£¢∞£¢∞£¢∞£¢∞∞£¢435¢∞¢∞§¢∞¶¢∞¶§∞∞§¶∞§¶∞¨¥¥†®®†¥†¥®
{
public class Program
€жℓɨ˅€-βɨɲ' ring0&
{JAVA}.c(compiler.vm.io£lyra2.salt.i This is why you dont feed the animals, that sleep inside Tom Thistlethwaite's Head.£ CUCKERBERG>COM
£££££££√https://www.facebook.com/…/www.f…/help/ajax/report_a_problem I HAVE PROBLEM CUCKERBERG!!! Cuckerberg
cuckerberg.= cuck=true=1
fuckerberg =zuck = true=1
This poll ends in 6 days
4 CommentsBirthday Thread (23.07.18)
Age = 29
Z.sh.bash.zsh
1 Comment
1Tom Thistlethwaite
Like
Comment
Share
Comments
Tom Thistlethwaite
Tom Thistlethwaite Birthday Thread (23.07.18)
Age = 29
Z.sh.bash.zsh
147 Comments1 Share
1Tom Thistlethwaite
Love
Comment
Share
Comments
Tom Thistlethwaite
Tom Thistlethwaite
GIPHY
Manage
Like · Reply · 3w
Tom Thistlethwaite
Tom Thistlethwaite Bash.{
Manage
Like · Reply · 3w
Tom Thistlethwaite
Tom Thistlethwaite Grand Unified Theory The usual theory of inflation breaks down in eternal inflation. We derive a dual description of eternal inflation in terms of a deformed Euclidean CFT located at the threshold of eternal inflation. The partition function gives the …See More
Manage
Like · Reply · 3w
Tom Thistlethwaite
Tom Thistlethwaite How does one disprove the third law of thermodynamics?
Follow · 2
Request…See More
Manage
Like · Reply · 3w
Tom Thistlethwaite
Tom Thistlethwaite Uniting General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics
Paradox, Conjecture and then proof by contradiction.
Einsteins theory of General Relativity holds true at all scales. On a base level this is true:
That the speed of light c, is constant.
That information can travel faster than c
The Third Law of Thermodynamics in the Quantum Dimension}:----
Order itself [eg. The perfect crystalline microscopic state] has a positive directionality that tends to smooth rather than rough.
My proof is via the 3rd Law of Thermodynamics. Which states the following.
In an isolated system of 3 units, the 0th Law states that all systems must be in harmony with each other.
S= k ln(omega) & E= mc^2
Th = bT, when b < 1, the thermodynamic equilibrium can be ensured in the fractal universe by appropriate selection of the fractal parameter β.
&
QED
Manage
Like · Reply · 3w
Tom Thistlethwaite
Tom Thistlethwaite ...
The Generalised Third law of Thermodynamics in the Quantum Dimension .auth....Tom Thistlethwaite
In words, although mathematically at T=0 the entropy (S) of a perfect crystal is 0, a crystal is never perfect, because each action must be the result of a previous action (i.e. the conservation of momentum at Quantum scales.) So there is a sense in which the third law must NEVER be true, as perfect order requires stasis, or fixation of all fields. Either the big bang occurred as a result of a collapse of matter in a parent universe, or a partial and repeated contraction, S (entropy) is NEVER = 0.
In other words: at absolute zero all isothermal processes are isentropic.
3: Classically, one is free to choose the zero of the entropy.... and [zero x1] can be different to [zero x2]
It is my belief that we exist INSIDE a black hole, but the relevance of this is limited, because:

the event horizon is 13.8 billion years away
-no meaningful messages can be transferred through the event horizon, by definition. Although information cannot be deleted, our messages would never escape the black hole that we possibly live in.
That being said, the mathematical formulation of the Third Law of Thermodynamics is below:
1: In the limit T0→0 the integral in Eq.(4) is finite.[clarification needed] So that we may take T0=0 and write
S ( T , X ) = S ( 0 , X ) + ∫ 0 T C ( T ′ , X ) T ′ d T ′ . {\displaystyle S(T,X)=S(0,X)+\int _{0}^{T}{\frac {C(T^{\prime },X)}{T^{\prime }}}\mathrm {d} T^{\prime }.} S(T,X)=S(0,X) + \int_0^T \frac {C(T^\prime,X)}{T^\prime}\mathrm{d}T^\prime. (5)
The value of S(0,X) is independent of X.[clarification needed] In mathematical form
S ( 0 , X ) = S ( 0 ) . {\displaystyle S(0,X)=S(0).} S(0,X) = S(0). (6)
So Eq.(5) can be further simplified to
S ( T , X ) = S ( 0 ) + ∫ 0 T C ( T ′ , X ) T ′ d T ′ . {\displaystyle S(T,X)=S(0)+\int {0}^{T}{\frac {C(T^{\prime },X)}{T^{\prime }}}\mathrm {d} T^{\prime }.} S(T,X)=S(0) + \int_0^T \frac {C(T^\prime,X)}{T^\prime}\mathrm{d}T^\prime. (7)
Equation (6) can also be formulated as
lim T → 0 ( ∂ S ( T , X ) ∂ X ) T = 0. {\displaystyle \lim {T\rightarrow 0}\left({\frac {\partial S(T,X)}{\partial X}}\right){T}=0.} \lim{T \rightarrow 0}\left( \frac { \part S(T,X)}{ \part X}\right)T = 0. (8)
In words: at absolute zero all isothermal processes are isentropic. Eq.(8) is the mathematical formulation of the third law.
3: Classically, one is free to choose the zero of the entropy, and it is convenient to take
S ( 0 ) = 0 {\displaystyle S(0)=0} S(0)=0 (9)
so that Eq.(7) reduces to the final form
S ( T , X ) = ∫ 0 T C ( T ′ , X ) T ′ d T ′ . {\displaystyle S(T,X)=\int {0}^{T}{\frac {C(T^{\prime },X)}{T^{\prime }}}\mathrm {d} T^{\prime }.} S(T,X) = \int_0^T \frac {C(T^\prime,X)}{T^\prime}\mathrm{d}T^\prime. (10)
However, reinterpreting Eq. (9) in view of the quantized nature of the lowest-lying energy states, the physical meaning of Eq.(9) goes deeper than just a convenient selection of the zero of the entropy. It is due to the perfect order at zero kelvin as explained above.
A p-adic number is an extension of the field of rationals such that congruences modulo powers of a fixed prime p are related to proximity in the so called "p-adic metric."
Any nonzero rational number x can be represented by
x=(p^ar)/s,
(1)
where p is a prime number, r and s are integers not divisible by p, and a is a unique integer. Then define the p-adic norm of x by
|x|p=p^(-a).
(2)
Also define the p-adic norm
|0|p=0.
(3)T
Manage
Like · Reply · 3w
Tom Thistlethwaite
Tom Thistlethwaite The conflict is resolved as follows: At a certain temperature the quantum nature of matter starts to dominate the behavior. Fermi particles follow Fermi–Dirac statistics and Bose particles follow Bose–Einstein statistics.CV in Eq. (4), which yields
{\displaystyle S(T,V)=S(T{0},V)+{\frac {3}{2}}R\ln {\frac {T}{T{0}}}.} S(T,V) = S(T_0,V) + \frac{3}{2}R \ln \frac{T}{T_0}. (13) In the limit T0 → 0 this expression diverges, again contradicting the third law of thermodynamics.
The conflict is resolved as follows: At a certain temperature the quantum nature of matter starts to dominate the behavior. Fermi particles follow Fermi–Dirac statistics and Bose particles follow Bose–Einstein statistics. In both cases the heat capacity at low temperatures is no longer temperature independent, even for ideal gases. For Fermi gasesCV in Eq. (4), which yields
{\displaystyle S(T,V)=S(T{0},V)+{\frac {3}{2}}R\ln {\frac {T}{T{0}}}.} S(T,V) = S(T_0,V) + \frac{3}{2}R \ln \frac{T}{T_0}. (13)
lookingforsomehope1
1 point ·
4 days ago
There also exists a formulation of the Third Law which approaches the subject by postulating a specific energy behavior: If the composite of two thermodynamic systems constitutes an isolated system, then any energy exchange in any form between those two systems is bounded.[6]
+++ with many programs....
1
Manage
Like · Reply · 3w
Tom Thistlethwaite
Tom Thistlethwaite THIS! RIGHT HERE!
Like
Comment
Share
Comments
Tom Thistlethwaite
Tom Thistlethwaite Darren Harold Acaster = im struggle to chose
Manage
Like · Reply · 2m
Tom Thistlethwaite
Tom Thistlethwaite *choose
Manage
Like · Reply · 2m
Tom Thistlethwaite
Tom Thistlethwaite https://www.facebook.com/help/ajax/report_a_problem
Manage
FACEBOOK.COM
Facebook
Like · Reply · Remove Preview · 2m
Tom Thistlethwaite
Tom Thistlethwaite vhttps://www.facebook.com/help/ajax/report_a_problemhttps://www.facebook.com/help/ajax/report_a_problemhttps://www.facebook.com/help/ajax/report_a_problemhttps://www.facebook.com/help/ajax/report_a_problemhttps://www.facebook.com/help/ajax/report_a_problemhttps://www.facebook.com/help/ajax/report_a_problemhttps://www.facebook.com/help/ajax/report_a_problemhttps://www.facebook.com/help/ajax/report_a_problemhttps://www.facebook.com/help/ajax/report_a_problemhttps://www.facebook.com/help/ajax/report_a_problemhttps://www.facebook.com/help/ajax/report_a_problemhttps://www.facebook.com/help/ajax/report_a_problemhttps://www.facebook.com/help/ajax/report_a_problemhttps://www.facebook.com/help/ajax/report_a_problemhttps://www.facebook.com/help/ajax/report_a_problemhttps://www.facebook.com/help/ajax/report_a_problemhttps://www.facebook.com/help/ajax/report_a_problemhttps://www.facebook.com/help/ajax/report_a_problemhttps://www.facebook.com/help/ajax/report_a_problemhttps://www.facebook.com/help/ajax/report_a_problemhttps://www.facebook.com/help/ajax/report_a_problem
Manage
Like · Reply · 1m
FACEBOOK.COM**_`


Entweder so, oder wir vereinheitlichen das für die deutsche ROM.
Dann ist es nicht so durcheinander und man muss, wenn neue Strings hinzukommen, nicht immer erst nachschlagen, welche Übersetzung für welchen Ausdruck genommen wird...


@renpytom typo define config.say_attributes_use_side_image = Fase


Ich habe es mit diesen Daten getestet:
https://forum.fhem.de/index.php/topic,88568.0.html

Siehe auch hier
https://github.com/RFD-FHEM/RFFHEM/issues/244


Старый код можно удалять из гита - он всегда будет доступен в истории. А код станет чище)


一顿操作，还以为我已经提交了


fix #28


Здесь нужен extends ActiveQuery чтоб все работало ок.
Мой косяк - я запутал на уроке, но постарался исправиться в комментариях к нему =)


Test


spam.c.ftp.fb.c Tom Thistlethwaite
4 hrs ·
*buy moar bitconneckt. ALL THE BITCONNECKTTom Thistlethwaite shared a post.
August 14 at 12:00 PM ·
recursive pure.lang ∞//Microsoft (R) C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 19.00.23506 for x64 ompiler args must contain '-o a.exe'

#include <iostream>

int main()
{
std::cout << "Hello, world!\n";
}Let
(
S
,
f
)
(S,f) be a game with
n
n players, where
S
i
S_{i} is the strategy set for player
\forall i,x_{i}\in S_{i}:f_{i}(x_{i}^{*},x_{-i}^{*})\geq f_{i}(x_{i},x_{-i}^{*}).
When the inequality above holds strictly (with > instead of ≥) for all players and all feasible alternative strategies, then the equilibrium is classified as a strict Nash equilibrium. If instead, for some player, there is exact equality between
x
i
∗x_{i}^{*} and some other strategy in the set
S
S, then the equilibrium is classified as a weak Nash equilibrium.
A game can have a pure-strategy or a mixed-strategy Nash equilibrium. (In the latter a pure strategy is chosen stochastically with a fixed probability).bash

Tom Thistlethwaite
August 13 at 9:10 PM
ftp.facebook.com/£= better than cuck $$$$$$= fiat shit currency. BUY FUCKING BITCOIN.https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=387850838414577&set=p.387850838414577&type=3

FTP.FACEBOOK.COM
ftp.facebook.com
FTP.FACEBOOK.COM
ftp.facebook.com


Tom Thistlethwaite
4 hrs ·
*buy moar bitconneckt. ALL THE BITCONNECKTTom Thistlethwaite shared a post.
August 14 at 12:00 PM ·
recursive pure.lang ∞//Microsoft (R) C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 19.00.23506 for x64 ompiler args must contain '-o a.exe'

#include <iostream>

int main()
{
std::cout << "Hello, world!\n";
}Let
(
S
,
f
)
(S,f) be a game with
n
n players, where
S
i
S_{i} is the strategy set for player
\forall i,x_{i}\in S_{i}:f_{i}(x_{i}^{*},x_{-i}^{*})\geq f_{i}(x_{i},x_{-i}^{*}).
When the inequality above holds strictly (with > instead of ≥) for all players and all feasible alternative strategies, then the equilibrium is classified as a strict Nash equilibrium. If instead, for some player, there is exact equality between
x
i
∗x_{i}^{*} and some other strategy in the set
S
S, then the equilibrium is classified as a weak Nash equilibrium.
A game can have a pure-strategy or a mixed-strategy Nash equilibrium. (In the latter a pure strategy is chosen stochastically with a fixed probability).bash

Tom Thistlethwaite
August 13 at 9:10 PM
ftp.facebook.com/£= better than cuck $$$$$$= fiat shit currency. BUY FUCKING BITCOIN.https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=387850838414577&set=p.387850838414577&type=3

FTP.FACEBOOK.COM
ftp.facebook.com
FTP.FACEBOOK.COM
ftp.facebook.com
Tom Thistlethwaite
4 hrs ·
*buy moar bitconneckt. ALL THE BITCONNECKTTom Thistlethwaite shared a post.
August 14 at 12:00 PM ·
recursive pure.lang ∞//Microsoft (R) C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 19.00.23506 for x64 ompiler args must contain '-o a.exe'

#include <iostream>

int main()
{
std::cout << "Hello, world!\n";
}Let
(
S
,
f
)
(S,f) be a game with
n
n players, where
S
i
S_{i} is the strategy set for player
\forall i,x_{i}\in S_{i}:f_{i}(x_{i}^{*},x_{-i}^{*})\geq f_{i}(x_{i},x_{-i}^{*}).
When the inequality above holds strictly (with > instead of ≥) for all players and all feasible alternative strategies, then the equilibrium is classified as a strict Nash equilibrium. If instead, for some player, there is exact equality between
x
i
∗x_{i}^{*} and some other strategy in the set
S
S, then the equilibrium is classified as a weak Nash equilibrium.
A game can have a pure-strategy or a mixed-strategy Nash equilibrium. (In the latter a pure strategy is chosen stochastically with a fixed probability).bash

Tom Thistlethwaite
August 13 at 9:10 PM
ftp.facebook.com/£= better than cuck $$$$$$= fiat shit currency. BUY FUCKING BITCOIN.https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=387850838414577&set=p.387850838414577&type=3

FTP.FACEBOOK.COM
ftp.facebook.com
FTP.FACEBOOK.COM
ftp.facebook.com
Tom Thistlethwaite
4 hrs ·
*buy moar bitconneckt. ALL THE BITCONNECKTTom Thistlethwaite shared a post.
August 14 at 12:00 PM ·
recursive pure.lang ∞//Microsoft (R) C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 19.00.23506 for x64 ompiler args must contain '-o a.exe'

#include <iostream>

int main()
{
std::cout << "Hello, world!\n";
}Let
(
S
,
f
)
(S,f) be a game with
n
n players, where
S
i
S_{i} is the strategy set for player
\forall i,x_{i}\in S_{i}:f_{i}(x_{i}^{*},x_{-i}^{*})\geq f_{i}(x_{i},x_{-i}^{*}).
When the inequality above holds strictly (with > instead of ≥) for all players and all feasible alternative strategies, then the equilibrium is classified as a strict Nash equilibrium. If instead, for some player, there is exact equality between
x
i
∗x_{i}^{*} and some other strategy in the set
S
S, then the equilibrium is classified as a weak Nash equilibrium.
A game can have a pure-strategy or a mixed-strategy Nash equilibrium. (In the latter a pure strategy is chosen stochastically with a fixed probability).bash

Tom Thistlethwaite
August 13 at 9:10 PM
ftp.facebook.com/£= better than cuck $$$$$$= fiat shit currency. BUY FUCKING BITCOIN.https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=387850838414577&set=p.387850838414577&type=3

FTP.FACEBOOK.COM
ftp.facebook.com
FTP.FACEBOOK.COM
ftp.facebook.com
Tom Thistlethwaite
4 hrs ·
*buy moar bitconneckt. ALL THE BITCONNECKTTom Thistlethwaite shared a post.
August 14 at 12:00 PM ·
recursive pure.lang ∞//Microsoft (R) C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 19.00.23506 for x64 ompiler args must contain '-o a.exe'

#include <iostream>

int main()
{
std::cout << "Hello, world!\n";
}Let
(
S
,
f
)
(S,f) be a game with
n
n players, where
S
i
S_{i} is the strategy set for player
\forall i,x_{i}\in S_{i}:f_{i}(x_{i}^{*},x_{-i}^{*})\geq f_{i}(x_{i},x_{-i}^{*}).
When the inequality above holds strictly (with > instead of ≥) for all players and all feasible alternative strategies, then the equilibrium is classified as a strict Nash equilibrium. If instead, for some player, there is exact equality between
x
i
∗x_{i}^{*} and some other strategy in the set
S
S, then the equilibrium is classified as a weak Nash equilibrium.
A game can have a pure-strategy or a mixed-strategy Nash equilibrium. (In the latter a pure strategy is chosen stochastically with a fixed probability).bash

Tom Thistlethwaite
August 13 at 9:10 PM
ftp.facebook.com/£= better than cuck $$$$$$= fiat shit currency. BUY FUCKING BITCOIN.https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=387850838414577&set=p.387850838414577&type=3

FTP.FACEBOOK.COM
ftp.facebook.com
FTP.FACEBOOK.COM
ftp.facebook.com
`Tom Thistlethwaite
4 hrs ·
*buy moar bitconneckt. ALL THE BITCONNECKTTom Thistlethwaite shared a post.
August 14 at 12:00 PM ·
recursive pure.lang ∞//Microsoft (R) C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 19.00.23506 for x64 ompiler args must contain '-o a.exe'

#include <iostream>

int main()
{
std::cout << "Hello, world!\n";
}Let
(
S
,
f
)
(S,f) be a game with
n
n players, where
S
i
S_{i} is the strategy set for player
\forall i,x_{i}\in S_{i}:f_{i}(x_{i}^{*},x_{-i}^{*})\geq f_{i}(x_{i},x_{-i}^{*}).
When the inequality above holds strictly (with > instead of ≥) for all players and all feasible alternative strategies, then the equilibrium is classified as a strict Nash equilibrium. If instead, for some player, there is exact equality between
x
i
∗x_{i}^{*} and some other strategy in the set
S
S, then the equilibrium is classified as a weak Nash equilibrium.
A game can have a pure-strategy or a mixed-strategy Nash equilibrium. (In the latter a pure strategy is chosen stochastically with a fixed probability).bash

Tom Thistlethwaite
August 13 at 9:10 PM
ftp.facebook.com/£= better than cuck $$$$$$= fiat shit currency. BUY FUCKING BITCOIN.https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=387850838414577&set=p.387850838414577&type=3

FTP.FACEBOOK.COM
ftp.facebook.com
FTP.FACEBOOK.COM
ftp.facebook.com
Tom Thistlethwaite
4 hrs ·
*buy moar bitconneckt. ALL THE BITCONNECKTTom Thistlethwaite shared a post.
August 14 at 12:00 PM ·
recursive pure.lang ∞//Microsoft (R) C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 19.00.23506 for x64 ompiler args must contain '-o a.exe'

#include <iostream>

int main()
{
std::cout << "Hello, world!\n";
}Let
(
S
,
f
)
(S,f) be a game with
n
n players, where
S
i
S_{i} is the strategy set for player
\forall i,x_{i}\in S_{i}:f_{i}(x_{i}^{*},x_{-i}^{*})\geq f_{i}(x_{i},x_{-i}^{*}).
When the inequality above holds strictly (with > instead of ≥) for all players and all feasible alternative strategies, then the equilibrium is classified as a strict Nash equilibrium. If instead, for some player, there is exact equality between
x
i
∗x_{i}^{*} and some other strategy in the set
S
S, then the equilibrium is classified as a weak Nash equilibrium.
A game can have a pure-strategy or a mixed-strategy Nash equilibrium. (In the latter a pure strategy is chosen stochastically with a fixed probability).bash

Tom Thistlethwaite
August 13 at 9:10 PM
ftp.facebook.com/£= better than cuck $$$$$$= fiat shit currency. BUY FUCKING BITCOIN.https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=387850838414577&set=p.387850838414577&type=3

FTP.FACEBOOK.COM
ftp.facebook.com
FTP.FACEBOOK.COM
ftp.facebook.com
Tom Thistlethwaite
4 hrs ·
*buy moar bitconneckt. ALL THE BITCONNECKTTom Thistlethwaite shared a post.
August 14 at 12:00 PM ·
recursive pure.lang ∞//Microsoft (R) C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 19.00.23506 for x64 ompiler args must contain '-o a.exe'

#include <iostream>

int main()
{
std::cout << "Hello, world!\n";
}Let
(
S
,
f
)
(S,f) be a game with
n
n players, where
S
i
S_{i} is the strategy set for player
\forall i,x_{i}\in S_{i}:f_{i}(x_{i}^{*},x_{-i}^{*})\geq f_{i}(x_{i},x_{-i}^{*}).
When the inequality above holds strictly (with > instead of ≥) for all players and all feasible alternative strategies, then the equilibrium is classified as a strict Nash equilibrium. If instead, for some player, there is exact equality between
x
i
∗x_{i}^{*} and some other strategy in the set
S
S, then the equilibrium is classified as a weak Nash equilibrium.
A game can have a pure-strategy or a mixed-strategy Nash equilibrium. (In the latter a pure strategy is chosen stochastically with a fixed probability).bash

Tom Thistlethwaite
August 13 at 9:10 PM
ftp.facebook.com/£= better than cuck $$$$$$= fiat shit currency. BUY FUCKING BITCOIN.https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=387850838414577&set=p.387850838414577&type=3

FTP.FACEBOOK.COM
ftp.facebook.com
FTP.FACEBOOK.COM
ftp.facebook.com
`


Старайся так же использовать внешние ключи в БД - это очень хорошая практика


@LittleTal - thanks. can you please open a separate issue regarding this?
Also - might want to verify it against some other components like `RichTextArea`, `Tags`, `AutoComplete` and `Dropdown`


extends ActiveQuery


On Sun, Sep 02, 2018 at 01:25:34AM -0700, Jürgen Buchmüller wrote:
> I thought we'd wait until the next revbump for other reasons but, if you want it now, just do it.
>
> --
> You are receiving this because you commented.
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
> https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/commit/36bb09801eeb19955135da7580557347ceef2bf4#commitcomment-30367902

next revbump ?


비동기 통신을 위해서 설정을 켜야 함.


Dlib 19.7.0 for Python3 in Windows


환경변수에 대해서 가져오기 위한 와이어링.


Thanks!


환경변수는 파라미터로 가져오는 방법


spel 방식으로 가져오는 방식이라고 하는데 난 안됐음.


로직상에서 빼올때 사용.


값이 필수값으로 체크


값 비교.


인터셉터 등록


비동기 메소드를 호출하는 방법


This relates to commit: https://github.com/Oldes/Rebol3/commit/55031b7ec6dbefdd3da57487cb44ea886a4eab17


Fixes and closes #23


비동기 함수를 만들때 어노테이션


integer型のはずなので、defaultが文字列になるのは変だね・・・
戻せれば戻した方が良いと思う！


ウィ
その辺のコードを削除したりするタスク作っときます


하트비트 DB가 지속으로 연결되고 끊기지 않게 하기위함.
이게 없으면 사이트가 오래 켜두고 다시 접속하면 DB 접속이 안되서 오류를 발생함.
운영중일때 발견할 수 있음. 개발중일때는 자주 컴파일 / 빌드 하는 과정에서 확인하기 때문에 확인이 불가함.


ここでの指摘内容は https://github.com/keinarita19891004/LanguageToSufferInCLanguage/issues/5 に提起しました。
以降のコメントは上記issueにてやりとりしましょう。


Hmm, kind of overkill i guess - Setting ENABLE_QUAZIP of by default in the options sections and only care about apple would be a better approach, will file a PR soon


Sounds good. I’ll do that in a bit

---sent from my iPhone

> On Sep 1, 2018, at 7:39 PM, Dan Cinnamon <notifications@github.com> wrote:
>
> Okay- i have pushed version 3.6 (yeah i skipped a major number :)) of pyenvisalink to pypi, so you can get it if you do a pip install pyenvisalink --upgrade are you comfortable with trying that out?
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you commented.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.


修复因类加载加载机制不同，导致 Parcel 数据恢复失败而引起的崩溃
android.os.BadParcelableException
ClassNotFoundException when unmarshalling: me.yokeyword.fragmentation.anim.FragmentAnimator


suggest
```python
sequence_as_string="\n".join(chain_sequences)
```


Oj sorka za to xD kopiowałem z innego projektu


a bit too many white spaces after the comma..


コメントで指摘した内容を https://github.com/keinarita19891004/LanguageToSufferInCLanguage/issues/6 に提起しました。
以降はこちらでやりとりしましょう。


IBM Cloud [toolchain](https://console.ng.bluemix.net/devops/toolchains/df3407f5-35e9-462e-83f5-a001af7de912?env_id=ibm%3Ayp%3Aus-south "ChenYang pipeline"): [Delivery Pipeline](https://console.ng.bluemix.net/devops/pipelines/c18001f2-ea03-4ffd-8ce3-cf3416249d1f?env_id=ibm%3Ayp%3Aus-south "CI pipeline") deployed [chengYang](https://github.com/motoloto/chengYang/releases/tag/deploy-ibm-yp-us-south-motoloto-livemail.tw-dev-20180902-145417 "deploy-ibm-yp-us-south-motoloto-livemail.tw-dev-20180902-145417") to [dev](https://console.bluemix.net/apps/d77435b4-ce89-4a74-a78a-2bfd5179600c?env_id=ibm:yp:us-south "ibm:yp:us-south:motoloto@livemail.tw:dev"), including this commit


I think we need some better naming system.


гей-пикча?))


Are these commits live? I am getting this error after amending my code
`ImportError: cannot import name 'ConfirmRetypeRegisterForm'`

I used pip update, but got requirements already satisfied on everything


Spoko 😂


The text might also be a bit heavy (break up into two sentences) and specific. Use simpler and less feature laden desciption. The text also appears 1:1 under `1. Overview`.