The video opens with a woman in a helmet unveiling her face mask, and then shows a close-up shot of an egg being broken.Next, the video switches to a man sitting at a table with a laptop in front of him, wearing a gray towel, seemingly working on something.The video unfolds a step-by-step history of the U.S. war in Vietnam through this man's narrative.In the video, the men refer to a photo taken by Nick Utah of Kim Phuc, a 9-year-old girl who suffered severe burns to her body when she was napalmed while fleeing the Vietnam War.This event not only sparked international attention, but also became a landmark moment in the Vietnam War.The video then details the background of the Vietnam War, including the development of the national movement in Vietnam as a French colony in the 1940s and the Japanese occupation of Vietnam during World War II.With the end of the war and the defeat of Japan, Vietnam's communist leader Ho Chi Minh City declared independence, but France disagreed with the independence of its former colony and started the Indochina War.France fared poorly in this war, lacked support, and eventually withdrew from Vietnam.The United States then stepped in to support the South Vietnamese regime in an attempt to stop the spread of communism in Southeast Asia.The video further depicts the brutality of the Vietnam War, including the guerrilla warfare in North Vietnam and the Viet Cong's terrorist attacks on the South Vietnamese regime.These terrorist activities led to the deaths of a large number of officials and people and increased the tension of the war.The video mentions that U.S. President Richard Nixon considered a nuclear strike on Vietnam, but ultimately did not carry it out.The video ends by going back to modern times and summarizing the impact of the Vietnam War and how it changed the history of Vietnam and the United States through a man sitting at a table.The man also mentioned some business content, introducing a business called tenkov and emphasizing its advantages in business services, including free business registration, account maintenance and international money transfers.Overall, the video depicts in detail the causes, course and impact of the Vietnam War through historical photographs and narratives, emphasizing the brutality of the war and its far-reaching impact on the international political landscape.[00:10:00->00:20:00] The video footage shows a man sitting at a table with a laptop in front of him, wearing a gray towel, and appearing to be recounting some key details of the Vietnam War.The background of the image looks clean and professional, and the man's focused look reveals a deep understanding of this history.He began by explaining Saigon's importance as the capital of South Vietnam, noting that the city was not only the center of political power, but that power rested almost entirely in the hands of the Prime Minister and his family.The Prime Minister's brother serves as Prime Minister, while another brother heads the secret police.This familial power structure made it nearly impossible for people who were not relatives or friends to make a difference in South Vietnamese politics.U.S. aid money is also often controlled by these families, leading to a significant drain on resources.The men then mentioned the other side of U.S. aid - the influx of weapons.Not only did these weapons equip the South Vietnamese army, but some of them also found their way to the black market through the intermediary of American officials and were even used for humanitarian aid.This complexity has exacerbated Vietnam's internal turmoil.The scene switches to a soldier in a forest with palm trees in the background.The men go on to recount that the civil war not only devastated the Vietnamese people, but also affected Laos and Cambodia.The escalating conflict between the socialist forces in Laos and the Royal Government and the North Vietnamese use of the corridor, known as the "Ho Chi Minh Trail", to funnel weapons and personnel to South Vietnam further increased tensions.Next, the men describe the South Vietnamese government's small victories along the border, but these victories did not change the overall situation.South Vietnam's military forces were frequently thwarted in their struggles against the guerrillas, who, with their familiarity with the terrain, continued to rout government forces.The South Vietnamese government had to turn to the United States, which sent helicopter gunships to provide support.At the end of the video, the scene shifts to a group of soldiers standing in the jungle with flames burning around them as they appear to be preparing for an upcoming battle.In 1965, the U.S. began a full-scale invasion of Vietnam, the men concluded.The invasion included Operation THUNDERBOLT bombing of North Vietnam and a series of large-scale military operations.The U.S. Air Force's indiscriminate bombing attempted to force the North Vietnamese into submission, but the Vietnamese, with Chinese support and Soviet military assistance, still possessed strong air defenses, making it difficult to fully exploit U.S. air superiority.Throughout the narrative, the man's tone is calm and firm, as if he is cautioning the audience about the brutality and complexity of war with lessons from history.This video not only depicts the background and course of the Vietnam War in detail, but also reveals the political and economic factors behind it, giving a deeper understanding of this period of history.[00:20:00->00:30:00] In the video, the image is once again focused on the man sitting at the table.Wearing a gray towel and with a laptop in front of him, he spoke intently about air defenses in the Vietnam War and their impact on U.S. forces.The man's tone was calm and firm, as if he was presenting the audience with a piece of history that could not be ignored.Since the first year of the war, he explained, the Americans have never had it easy in the skies of Vietnam.The establishment of air defenses has caused U.S. planes and helicopters to be shot down by missiles on a regular basis, which has resulted in huge losses for the U.S. military.He mentioned that the presence of these air defenses made it almost impossible for U.S. forces to conduct effective strikes in the air, or even to make their presence felt in the sky, because once they entered Vietnamese airspace, they faced a high risk of being shot down.The man then tells of an important military operation, Operation Starlight.This was a ground operation initiated by Army units to dislodge guerrillas and North Vietnamese troops from controlled territory.He emphasized that the goal of the operation was to completely clear the North Vietnamese army's strongholds in South Vietnam, but despite the partial victory, the overall situation had not changed as a result.The scene switches to a photograph taken by Horst Fass showing U.S. military helicopters in the skies of Vietnam.The men noted that these helicopters face a serious threat from ground-based air defenses when they are in the air on missions.He describes these helicopters fighting in the jungle, engaging the enemy on the ground while dealing with anti-aircraft fire overhead.This complex combat environment has resulted in mounting losses for U.S. forces.The men then mention the international community's involvement in the Vietnam War.He pointed out that the United States not only invested a lot of military resources, but also pulled in its allies in the Pacific, such as Australia, New Zealand, South Korea, Thailand, Japan and the Philippines.These countries not only provided material support, but also sent soldiers and pilots to participate in the fighting.North Vietnam, on the other hand, received support from China and the Soviet Union, especially the Soviet Union's provision of advanced weapons and military advisors, which gave North Vietnam a strong air defense capability during the war.The man goes on to explain that the brutality of this war is not only reflected in the military conflict, but also in the destruction of the natural environment.The United States implemented a policy of "ecocide" in Viet Nam by burning large areas of jungle and rice paddies with the use of napalm and massive amounts of pesticides in an attempt to destroy the basis for the survival of the North Vietnamese army.This practice has not only caused enormous damage to the natural environment, but has also resulted in a large number of civilian casualties and displacements.He mentioned that the brutality of the war had led both sides to resort to inhumane means.The U.S. bombing of villages and the use of chemical weapons were accompanied by similar retaliatory actions by North Vietnam.This vicious circle makes war even more brutal, with civilians being the greatest victims.The scene finally returns to the man's desktop, where he concludes that the Vietnam War was not only a military conflict, but a media war.An abundance of photographs and reports documented every detail of the war, making it one of the most well-documented conflicts in history.He emphasized that the war had a profound impact on American society, with the gradual rise of an anti-war movement that eventually prompted the U.S. government to reexamine its policy in Vietnam.Throughout the narrative, the man's tone remains calm and rational, as if he is using the lessons of history to warn the audience that the cruelty and complexity of war is far beyond imagination.This video not only depicts the background and course of the Vietnam War in detail, but also reveals the political and economic factors behind it, giving a deeper understanding of this period of history.[00:30:00->00:40:00] In the video, the man remains seated at a table with a laptop in front of him, dressed in a gray towel, and focuses on the complexities of the Vietnam War.The background of the image is clean and professional, and the look of the man reveals a deep understanding of this history.The men begin to explain that the Americans have a misconception about the North Vietnamese supporters, believing that they were summoned by the undead and are a bunch of uneducated people.However, this view is not widely shared and has instead become a pretext for action by the United States Government.He mentioned that this U.S. view not only influenced its policy toward North Vietnam, but also led to a huge waste of resources and the prolongation of the war.The man then recounts a postcard from a government official on which the official's date of birth was deliberately obfuscated.This behavior not only adds to the mystique of the officials, but also makes their identities more difficult to verify.He pointed out that such confusion not only affected the internal functioning of the Government, but also weakened the stability of the regime.The U.S. government has also had to deal with this confusion in its dealings with these officials, leading to more compromises and sacrifices.The men went on to say that U.S. propaganda efforts in Vietnam were very effective, not only through shortwave radio, leaflets, and second-hand tape recorders, but also by utilizing a large number of defectors.He mentioned that the U.S. spent $125 for each Vietnamese defector, while the budget for each Vietnamese was $15,000, and that this huge cost difference made propaganda a very important tool.He emphasized that these propaganda efforts have not only affected the situation within Viet Nam, but also had far-reaching implications for the international community.The men then mention Ho Chi Minh City, the key figure on the North Vietnamese side directing the war.He explained that Ho Chi Minh City is not only a symbol of North Vietnam, but is also respected by the people in both North and South Vietnam.He had widespread support on both sides of the border, and this unconditional welcome made him highly respected among the Vietnamese.By contrast, Saigon's officials and U.S. officers lost the trust of the population through corruption, especially those who trafficked in opium and humanitarian aid, and whose behavior severely corrupted the morale of both the South Vietnamese government and the U.S. military.The men go on to recount that during the war, the death rate of American troops was as high as one in five, and some of them were even addicted to opium.He referred to a known case in which a descendant of an American mafia family had been drafted into the army, fought in the Viet Nam war, was wounded and returned to Saigon, where he had utilized humanitarian aid for the opium trade, the arms trade and human trafficking.This corruption not only affects the combat effectiveness of the army, but also has a devastating effect on the entire course of the war.The scene switches to a group of soldiers standing in a jungle with brown <unk> trees in the background.The men conclude that despite the military superiority of the United States, the Vietnamese have learned how to fight, and the battles between the two sides have become incredibly bloody.After each battle, both sides claimed victory, but in fact, the course of the war did not change as a result.The video ends back at the man's desktop, where he emphasizes that this war is not just a military conflict, but a media war.Numerous photographs and reports documented every detail of the war, making it one of the most well-documented conflicts in history.He noted that the war had a profound effect on American society, with a gradual rise in the anti-war movement that eventually prompted the U.S. government to reexamine its policies in Vietnam.Throughout the narrative, the man's tone remains calm and firm, as if he is using the lessons of history to warn the audience that the cruelty and complexity of war is far beyond imagination.This video not only depicts the background and course of the Vietnam War in detail, but also reveals the political and economic factors behind it, giving a deeper understanding of this period of history.[00:40:00->00:50:00] In the video, the image is once again focused on the man sitting at the table.Wearing a gray towel and with a laptop in front of him, he focused on a key event in the Vietnam War.The background appears clean and professional, and the man's demeanor reveals a deep understanding of this history.The men begin to tell the story of the Lunar New Year Offensive of January 31, 1968, a massive offensive launched by North Vietnamese troops and guerrillas against South Vietnamese positions.He explained that the offensive not only made its mark on history, but also became a turning point in the Vietnam War.The scene switches to a group of soldiers standing in the jungle, surrounded by flames and smoke, who appear to be preparing for a fierce battle.The offensive, the men continued, began on March 30 and lasted until October, with Communist victories in localized battles.However, South Vietnam held the front line with air support.Nonetheless, the Americans realized that the war could no longer continue, and they began to induce the North Vietnamese to negotiate through intermediaries.The scene switches again to the man, who mentions that these negotiations began in late 1972, and that the North Vietnamese government had many discussions with the South Vietnamese government, but that progress was slow.The man's tone was calm and firm, as if he was using the lessons of history to warn the audience that the complexity and cruelty of war is far beyond imagination.He mentioned that in 1973, North Vietnam withdrew from the talks because the South Vietnamese representative had put forward unworkable conditions.The North Vietnamese representatives rose from the negotiating table and offered their terms, while the Americans were at an impasse, barely able to continue the negotiations.At the end of the video, the man concludes that despite the opening of peace talks, the war continues.The scene returns to the man's desktop again as he emphasizes that this war is not just a military conflict, but a political and psychological contest.He noted that the Vietnam War had a profound impact on American society, with the gradual rise of an anti-war movement that eventually prompted the U.S. government to reexamine its policy in Vietnam.Throughout the narrative, the men remain calm and rational, as if cautioning the audience with the lessons of history that the cruelty and complexity of war is far beyond imagination.This video not only depicts the background and course of the Vietnam War in detail, but also reveals the political and economic factors behind it, giving a deeper understanding of this period of history.[00:50:00->01:00:00] The video shows a man sitting at a table with a laptop in front of him, wearing a gray towel, and concentrating on the aftermath of the Vietnam War.The background appears clean and professional, and the man's demeanor reveals a deep understanding of this history.He began to recount the Lunar New Year Offensive of January 31, 1968, a massive offensive launched by North Vietnamese troops and guerrillas against South Vietnamese positions.The scene switches to a group of soldiers standing in the jungle, surrounded by flames and smoke, who appear to be preparing for a fierce battle.The offensive, the men continued, began on January 31 and lasted through October, despite Communist victories in localized battles and South Vietnamese holding the front line with air support.However, the Americans realized that the war could no longer continue, and through intermediaries they induced the North Vietnamese to negotiate.The scene switches again to the man, who mentions that these negotiations began in late 1972, and that the North Vietnamese government had many discussions with the South Vietnamese government, but that progress was slow.In 1973, the North Vietnamese withdrew from the talks because the South Vietnamese representatives offered unworkable conditions.The North Vietnamese representatives rose from the negotiating table and offered their terms, while the Americans were at an impasse, barely able to continue the negotiations.In the video, the men emphasize that the war continues despite the opening of peace talks.In an effort to force the North Vietnamese back to the negotiating table, the Americans began carpet bombing Vietnam, including Hanoi, in what would be the most powerful bombing of the war.The image shows an old collection of airplanes, with the planes on a row of columns, seemingly in good condition.The video then shows a black-and-white photo of the plane flying over a city, which appears to be an old photo of a city surrounded by flames and smoke.The men go on to recount that the Americans would drop a staggering number of bombs, including high explosives and napalm.He mentioned that what the Americans had done in Vietnam, Dresden and other places had triggered widespread condemnation by the international community.Negotiations resumed in Paris on January 27, 1973, with the signing of the Paris Agreement.The footage shows a group of men in formal attire signing documents in what appears to be a formal business meeting.The men explain that the Americans have signed the Paris Agreement and that they will be withdrawing their troops from both South and North Vietnam.In the spring of 1975, the fate of South Vietnam was sealed for the demoralized troops.The socialists had no trouble getting into Saigon, showing helicopters on a United States aircraft carrier being thrown into the sea as part of what became known as "Operation Storm."In April 1975, realizing that the war was lost, the Americans began evacuating embassy personnel, with helicopters landing one after another on the embassy roofs to take people to warships.At the end of the video, the man returns to the table and concludes that this war is not only a military conflict, but a political and psychological battle.The war had a profound effect on American society, and an anti-war movement gradually emerged, eventually prompting the U.S. government to reexamine its policies in Vietnam.He mentioned that the war was an absolutely terrible blow to the human psyche and ecology, and that thousands of lives were lost in this war.Throughout the narrative, the man's tone remains calm and firm, as if he is using the lessons of history to warn the audience that the cruelty and complexity of war is far beyond imagination.This video not only depicts the background and course of the Vietnam War in detail, but also reveals the political and economic factors behind it, giving a deeper understanding of this period of history.[01:00:00->01:10:00] In the video clip, the scene shifts to a woman sitting at a table with a microphone in front of her, into which she is speaking, seemingly on a phone connection.The woman's voice was firm and strong, and her expression revealed a deep understanding and emotion of this history.The background appeared clean and professional, without too much decoration, allowing the audience to focus more on her narration.She begins to tell the story of a nine-year-old girl who was napalmed during the Vietnam War.Despite the severity of her burns, she was resilient and survived.With obvious sympathy and admiration in her voice, the woman described the girl's injuries in detail: "She was burned very badly, by the terrible napalm, but she survived." The woman's tone is filled with admiration for the little girl, as if conveying to the audience a sense of indomitable courage.Then, she continued, the little girl survived the napalm blast, so resilient that she was able to continue to survive after surviving the blast.The woman mentioned that the little girl underwent a long stay in the hospital, but instead of being crushed by her injuries, she overcame the odds with amazing resilience.She was discharged from the hospital and continued to live a strong life."As she said, she became a tool." There is a hint of emotion in the woman's tone as she explains that the girl's story has become not only an iconic moment of the Vietnam War, but also an important symbol of the anti-war movement.Her experience has inspired sympathy and reflection around the world, bringing a deeper understanding of the brutality of war and the harm done to innocent civilians.Throughout the narrative, the woman's tone remains firm and infectious, as if she is using the lessons of this history to warn the audience that the brutality and complexity of war is far beyond imagination.This video not only depicts a specific event of the Vietnam War in detail, but also reveals the far-reaching effects of the war on individuals and society as a whole through the story of this little girl, giving a deeper understanding of this period of history.

Question: Why Vietnam was a shameful war.

Choices:
A. The Vietnam War was a war that did little to benefit Americans and failed, a war that spawned the anti-war movement, the hippie movement. The war also contained countless crimes against humanity and war crimes. That is why Vietnam was a shameful war.
B. The Vietnam War was a conflict marked by extensive use of chemical weapons and deforestation, but it ultimately strengthened international alliances and global security.
C. The Vietnam War was a strategic success for the United States, but it led to significant economic strain and political instability domestically, which overshadowed its military achievements.
D. The Vietnam War was a prolonged engagement that resulted in significant technological advancements in military equipment, though it failed to achieve its primary political objectives.

Answer: A

The Vietnam War was a war that did little to benefit Americans and failed, a war that spawned the anti-war movement, the hippie movement. The war also contained countless crimes against humanity and war crimes. That is why Vietnam was a shameful war.

The moderator considers the Vietnam War, a page in the history of the United States of America, to be a war that brought little to no benefit to Americans. [00:01:03->00:01:05]

And it failed, and the war spawned the anti-war movement, the hippie movement. [00:01:11->00:01:15]

This war also contained countless crimes against humanity and war crimes. That's why Vietnam was a shameful war. [00:01:20->00:01:22]

Question: How many wars did Vietnam go through?

Choices:
A. War against Japan, war against Britain, civil war, war against the United States, 4 wars.
B. War against Japan, war against France, war of secession, war against the United States, 4 wars.
C. War against Japan, war against France, war of unification, war against the Soviet Union, 4 wars.
D. War against China, war against France, war of independence, war against the United States, 4 wars.

Answer: B

War against Japan, war against France, war of secession, war against the United States, 4 wars.

Japanese occupation of Vietnam. Vietnam against Japan [00:01:47->00:02:55]

France participates in the Indochina War, so the war with Vietnam [00:03:03->00:04:32]

Vietnam's War of Secession, South Vietnam vs. North Vietnam [00:04:42->00:06:14]

Since the South Vietnamese government was unable to face the guerrilla movement, the United States intervened in the war, and American planes bombed North Vietnam [00:14:48->00:19:54].

Question: How many important historical events about Vietnam's recent past are told in the video?

Choices:
A. 6 important historical events
B. 4 significant historical milestones
C. 8 major historical occurrences
D. 5 key historical developments

Answer: A

Japan's defeat in the war the founding of Ho Chi Minh City and the French-Vietnamese War 2 events. [00:01:43->00:04:42]

The event of the beginning of the war of secession in Vietnam [00:12:13->00:14:42]

The event of the United States' total war against Vietnam [00:14:00->00:19:10]

Soviet officers provided things in Vietnam in terms of military instruction, which played a very important role in the Vietnam War [00:21:00->00:23:40]

Operation Hastings [00:32:59->00:37:42], conducted by the United States in the Vietnam War.

Question: Why did the US go to war with Vietnam?

Choices:
A. The U.S. entered the Vietnam War to support the French colonial government, which was struggling to maintain control over its Indochinese territories against rising nationalist movements.
B. Following a direct attack on U.S. naval forces in the Gulf of Tonkin, the U.S. Congress authorized military action to defend American interests and prevent further aggression from North Vietnam.
C. The U.S. initiated military intervention in Vietnam to secure access to its natural resources, particularly rubber and oil, which were vital to American industries during the Cold War era.
D. The current South Vietnamese government was no longer able to cope with the guerrilla movement, and the South Vietnamese turned to the Americans for help, and China offered military assistance to North Vietnam. The situation changed. Then the U.S. Congress passed the Tokyo Resolution, and then the U.S. went to war and bombed North Vietnam, and all the U.S. full-scale war against Vietnam began.

Answer: D

The current South Vietnamese government was no longer able to cope with the guerrilla movement, and the South Vietnamese turned to the Americans for help, and China offered military assistance to North Vietnam. The situation changed. Then the U.S. Congress passed the Tokyo Resolution, and then the U.S. went to war and bombed North Vietnam, and all the U.S. full-scale war against Vietnam began.

The present government of South Vietnam was no longer able to deal with the guerrilla movement, and they were fighting worse than the guerrillas. The South Vietnamese ask the Americans for help, and the Americans send two helicopter formations to cover. [00:14:48->00:15:16]

China provides military assistance to North Vietnam. The situation has changed. [00:15:25->00:15:33]

The U.S. Congress passed the Tokyo Resolution, and then the U.S. went to war with military action bombing North Vietnam, and all the U.S. all-out war against Vietnam began. [00:18:00->00:19:20]

Question: Why did the U.S. lose?

Choices:
A. There was corruption in the army, the Americans carried out massacres like they had done to the Indians before, sparking an anti-war movement in Europe, and the Americans understood that the war had reached a stalemate. The anti-war movement in the United States intensified, and eventually the Paris Agreement was signed and the United States withdrew its troops, declaring the Vietnam War a failure.
B. The U.S. military lacked advanced technology and strategic planning, leading to significant battlefield losses and a failure to achieve key objectives.
C. Economic sanctions imposed by the United Nations severely weakened the U.S. economy, forcing a withdrawal from Vietnam to focus on domestic recovery.
D. The Vietnamese forces received overwhelming support from the Soviet Union, including advanced weaponry and military advisors, which decisively shifted the balance of power.

Answer: A

There was corruption in the army, the Americans carried out massacres like they had done to the Indians before, sparking an anti-war movement in Europe, and the Americans understood that the war had reached a stalemate. The anti-war movement in the United States intensified, and eventually the Paris Agreement was signed and the United States withdrew its troops, declaring the Vietnam War a failure.

During the war every fifth soldier was using opium and the army was corrupt. [00:31:00->00:32:48]

The Americans carried out massacres like they did with the Indians before them, sparking the anti-war movement in Europe [00:42:16->00:42:55].

Americans understand that the war has reached a stalemate. The anti-war movement in the United States grew stronger and stronger, and more and more people said we don't need this war. At the same time the hippie movement was born [00:42:55->00:43:25]

Eventually the signing of the Paris Accords the US withdrew its troops and declared the Vietnam War a failure. [00:50:00->00:51:06]

Question: What would be the effect of the United States losing the Vietnam War?

Choices:
A. The outcome would have triggered a swift political realignment in favor of isolationist policies, with minimal impact on domestic culture and no significant consequences for the political careers of Nixon and his contemporaries.
B. The defeat would have resulted in a rapid expansion of U.S. military presence globally, accompanied by a surge in nationalist movements and a decline in cultural diversity within the United States.
C. The loss would have led to a significant boost in the U.S. economy due to reduced military spending, while strengthening diplomatic ties with Southeast Asian nations and fostering a pro-war sentiment domestically.
D. The defeat of this war would have made the overall national economy of the United States suffer, as well as affecting future international discourse and influence, with the emergence of an anti-war movement, and hippie movement in the country. It would have a profound impact on the future of society and culture, and the political trajectory of Nixon and other figures who were significantly affected politically by the Vietnam War might change, and this group of political figures might be implicated, step down, or even be criticized.

Answer: D

The defeat of this war would have made the overall national economy of the United States suffer, as well as affecting future international discourse and influence, with the emergence of an anti-war movement, and hippie movement in the country. It would have a profound impact on the future of society and culture, and the political trajectory of Nixon and other figures who were significantly affected politically by the Vietnam War might change, and this group of political figures might be implicated, step down, or even be criticized.

For the United States of America this unjust war, labor and injury, if there is not a lot of money and resources into the battlefield, the failure of this war will make the United States of America as a whole national economy will be affected, but also will affect the future of the international discourse and influence. [00:12:00->01:00:00]

The emergence of the anti-war movement, and the hippie movement in the country. This could have far-reaching consequences for the future of society and culture.

The political trajectory of figures such as Nixon, who suffered significantly politically as a result of the Vietnam War, may be altered, and this group of politicians may be implicated, step down or even possibly be deplored.

Question: What would have happened if the US had won the Vietnam War?

Choices:
A. A prolonged period of instability in Vietnam would have ensued, with the U.S. struggling to establish a stable pro-Western government amidst widespread insurgency.
B. The geopolitical balance in Southeast Asia would have shifted towards neutrality, with regional powers forming alliances independent of both U.S. and Soviet influence.
C. The Soviet Union would have intensified its influence in Southeast Asia, counterbalancing U.S. gains and fostering a resurgence of communist movements in the region.
D. The U.S. dominance in the Cold War is likely to expand further, leading to a political landscape in Southeast Asia that is more favorable to the U.S., with the main warring political forces dominating domestic politics.

Answer: D

The U.S. dominance in the Cold War is likely to expand further, leading to a political landscape in Southeast Asia that is more favorable to the U.S., with the main warring political forces dominating domestic politics.

The U.S. advantage in the Cold War could be further expanded, and the Soviet Union's influence in Asia would be squeezed even more. With its victory in Vietnam, the United States could further pursue its policy of containment of communism in Asia and enhance its strategic advantage over the Soviet Union globally, and the balance of the Cold War could be tipped further in favor of the United States.

The South Vietnamese regime supported by the United States would rule all of Vietnam, which became an important ally and strategic stronghold of the United States in Southeast Asia. The United States may further intervene in the internal affairs of other countries in Southeast Asia and support pro-American regimes, leading to a political landscape in Southeast Asia that is more in favor of the United States, and the development of communist forces in the region will be severely curtailed.

Main-war political forces will dominate domestic politics, and there may be a further rise in conservative thinking. The government's foreign policy may become more oriented towards military intervention and hegemony, the domestic political ecology may become more right-leaning, values such as democracy and freedom may be neglected to a certain extent, and political differences may revolve around issues such as how to consolidate hegemony abroad.

Question: What are the key elements of the video content?

Choices:
A. It is a video creator who tells the story of the Vietnam War and its impact on the international community, as well as the events that have arisen from the historical context of the time.
B. The video presents a detailed analysis of modern geopolitical conflicts, focusing on their economic implications and global trade relations.
C. This content explores the cultural evolution of Southeast Asia, highlighting traditional practices and their adaptation in contemporary society.
D. The video examines technological advancements during the Cold War era, particularly in space exploration and nuclear weapon development.

Answer: A

It is a video creator who tells the story of the Vietnam War and its impact on the international community, as well as the events that have arisen from the historical context of the time.


[00:00:00->00:10:00] This video chronicles a series of historical events concerning Lee Wan Yong (Lee Wanyong), centering on his political career on the Korean Peninsula in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.Through interviews with different personalities, historical photos and video clips, the video shows Lee Wan Yong's political choices and actions in a complex international situation.1. **Background presentation**:
   - The video begins with an introduction to the background of Lee Van Yong through the narratives of several different characters.He was not initially pro-Japanese, but rather held hostile feelings toward Japan.However, over time, his position changed.- Lee Wanyong's experience in the United States had a profound impact on his political outlook, making him a representative of the pro-American faction.2. **Murder of King Kojong and Empress Myeongseong**:
   - In 1894, the Sino-Japanese War broke out, and Japan's influence on the Korean Peninsula grew.The assassination of Empress Myeongseong by a Japanese agent was a huge blow to Gojong.Trapped in Gyeongbokgung Palace, King Gojong was under surveillance by pro-Japanese officials and Japanese.- Lee Man-yong, who was close to Gaozong and Empress Myeongseong, made several attempts to rescue Gaozong during this period, but the attempts failed due to close surveillance by Japan.3. **Plan to rescue King Gojong**:
   - On February 11, 1896, Lee Man-yong finally succeeded in planning a rescue operation by leading about 30 men to the royal palace and succeeded in bringing King Gojong out of Gyeongbokgung.- After the successful rescue, Takamune fled to the Russian consulate to escape the Japanese.This action not only saved the life of Emperor Gaozong, but also greatly enhanced Li Wanyong's political status.4. **Political advancement of Li Wanyong**:
   - By successfully rescuing Gao Zong, Li Wan Yong became one of his closest officials.He rose rapidly in political prominence and became an important figure in the Joseon dynasty.- He used this opportunity to actively establish contacts with foreign powers, especially diplomatic relations with the United States and Russia.With the help of American missionaries, Lee Man Yong continued to keep in touch with King Kojong, looking for opportunities to further consolidate his position.5. **Complicated international situation**:
   - The video also shows the complex international situation on the Korean peninsula at that time.Lee Wanyong not only has to deal with the Japanese threat, but also find a balance between the US and Russia.He strengthened his ties with foreign powers by creating a network of foreign missions centered in Nakdong.- Lee Wanyong's diplomacy and political savvy enabled him to maintain a relatively secure position in a volatile situation.6. **Summary**:
   - Through this video, viewers can see Lee Wan-yong's gradual transformation from a man hostile to Japan to a pro-American, and his success in rescuing Gojong at a critical moment, eventually becoming one of Gojong's closest officials.His political career has been full of challenges and opportunities, demonstrating his resilience and political wisdom in a complex international environment.This video not only documents Lee Wan-yong's personal experience, but also reflects the complex international political situation on the Korean Peninsula in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.[00:10:00->00:20:00] The video shows a man in a green shirt sitting on a couch and saying to the interviewer, "Would Japan do this? Did Japan do this? Did the Korean people do this?" He seems to be questioning the truth of a historical event.The scene switches to a man in ordinary clothes standing in front of a bookshelf, pointing his finger forward as if to emphasize his point: "Was it written in Korean by Japan in a newspaper that all Koreans can read? I saw these Korean words in the newspaper I was reading."His tone was full of skepticism and anger.Immediately afterward, the camera pans to a blackboard that reads, in Korean, "Cleanse, wash away his palace, leave your palace."This is clearly an order to someone important, suggesting a change of power.The video then shows several different scenes, including a man standing in front of a chat board, with what looks like a classroom in the background, discussing a historical event in which King Gao asked for foreign protection.He mentioned, "Abolish the king who demands the protection of foreign fanatics.At a time when the country is struggling, such a newspaper is very important."

The video goes on to show a woman in a blue shirt sitting on a couch, slightly nervous, saying, "I don't know how I got here, but I'm a little nervous."Then a man wearing glasses stood in front of a bookshelf and elaborated on how Gojong used Lee Wan-young to take control of the situation and pacify the restless people: 'Gojong let Lee Wan-young take control of the situation, in order to pacify the restless people.'"

As the video progresses, the images reveal the political transformation of Lee Wan-Uk in 1898, from a pro-American to a political figure who sold out the country's interests to foreign countries.One of the commenters on the video notes, "In 1898, Lee Wan-young sold out his country's interests abroad in order to enrich his flesh."The video then shows newspaper accusations of Lee Wan-yong's embezzlement and the public pressure he is facing: 'The media is accusing Wan-yong-li, right now.'"

Through a series of historical clips and character interviews, the video shows the political career of Lee Wan-young amidst the complex international situation on the Korean Peninsula in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.He gradually shifted from being a person hostile to Japan to a pro-American and then a pro-Japanese, each shift accompanied by deep concern for the country and its people.The video not only chronicles the personal ups and downs of Lee Wan-young, but also reflects the changing history of the Korean Peninsula during this tumultuous period.[00:20:00->00:30:00] In this video, the scene switches to a woman in a blue shirt, sitting in a softly lit room with a window in the background, who is talking to the camera.The subtitles of the video show that she is discussing the transformation that has taken place within Lee Van Yong, mentioning that he desperately needs to find someone, and that someone is himself.Her words revealed a thoughtful tone, as if she was trying to decipher Li Wanyong's complex journey.The scene then shifts to a well-dressed man standing in front of a bookshelf, holding a microphone and explaining in detail how Lee Van Yong experienced a change in political stance in 1898.He noted that Lee Wanyong gradually turned from a pro-American to a political figure who sold out the country's interests to foreign countries.This shift not only reflected his personal trade-offs and choices, but also revealed the complex political environment of the Korean Peninsula at that time.His narration is filled with a deep understanding of history and a careful analysis of the motivations of his characters.The video then shows scenes of Lee Wan-yong in conversation with a former colleague and early pro-Japanese activist.This colleague, Lee Hwa-young, is appointed as the new Minister of Justice, and Lee Wan-yong secretly requests that he place bridges in Japanese buildings, suggesting some kind of hidden political deal.This scene shows the tactics and strategies of Li Wan-yung's political struggle and his complex relationship with the Japanese forces through his request.As the video progresses, a man in a green shirt appears in front of the camera, revealing a sense of urgency in his tone, mentioning "I need you to let go of my leg."This quote clearly carries a metaphor, hinting at the political constraints that Li Wanyong is under and his determination to try to get out of them.The background music in the video further enhances this tense atmosphere.Next, the scene switches to a conversation between Lee Wan-Yong and another character, and the video credits show that Lee Wan-Yong was recommended by Japan's Yoyo Corporation, but his appointment was the opposite of what was expected.This episode reveals Lee Van Yong's political uncertainty and his attempts to find a balance between international forces.His words were filled with uncertainty about the future and worry about his personal destiny.The video goes on to show Lee Wan-yong's interaction with Japanese Prime Minister Ito Hirobumi on November 9, 1905, after Japan's victory in the Russo-Japanese War.Ito Hirobumi's arrival is described as an "invasion" of the Korean Peninsula, and Lee Man-yong displays a complex ambivalence in the face of strong Japanese pressure.While he was in awe of Japan's power, he had to consider the future of the country and his own political career.The final part of the video shows Lee Van Yong's role in the signing of the treaty through a series of historical clips and character interviews.He discussed with Gojong and his lieutenants how to respond to Japan's unilateral demands and eventually compromised under pressure.This series of events not only reflected Lee Wan-yong's personal choice, but also revealed the difficult situation of the Korean Peninsula at that time, which was surviving in the gap between international forces.Through delicate depictions and rich details, the whole video vividly shows Lee Wan Yong's political career in the complex international situation from the end of the 19th century to the beginning of the 20th century, which makes the viewers feel as if they were in the turbulence and changes of that era.[00:30:00->00:40:00] The video moves to a key turning point in Lee Wan-yong's political career between 1905 and 1907, further revealing his complex choices and inner struggles under Japanese power.The scene begins by showing a woman in a blue shirt sitting in a court room, her expression looking serious and expectant, as if she is waiting for an important moment.The subtitles suggest that this is a voting scene about the five people who support the treaty.The camera then switches to a man dressed in black and holding a microphone, who stands in front of a black backdrop as if he's making a serious pitch.His words are replaced by the subtitle "Eulsaojak", suggesting a particular historical context or concept.The video then shows another man wearing glasses standing in front of a bookshelf, holding a microphone and explaining in detail how Lee Van Yong experienced a change in political stance in 1898.He noted that Lee Wanyong gradually turned from a pro-American to a political figure who sold out the country's interests to foreign countries.This shift not only reflected his personal trade-offs and choices, but also revealed the complex political environment of the Korean Peninsula at that time.The video further shows the interaction between Lee Wanyong and Japanese Prime Minister Ito Hirobumi on November 18, 1905 at 1:00 am.Ito decides to vote in favor of the Korean Empire, while Lee Man-yong announces a "sinful pact" on behalf of the Empire.This scene, through delicate depiction, shows Li Wanyong's inner conflict and helplessness in the face of strong pressure from Japan.While he was in awe of Japan's power, he had to consider the future of the country and his own political career.Next, the scene switches to a group of men in military uniforms standing in front of a building posing for a photo, symbolizing a certain sense of ceremony after the signing of the treaty.One of the commenters in the video pointed out that even though the legislators voted in favor of the treaty by a majority, this does not mean that the treaty is valid or legal because it did not follow any formal procedures.This comment raises questions about the legitimacy of the treaty and reflects popular dissatisfaction with the government's behavior.The video goes on to show scenes of angry people chanting for the treaty to be destroyed.People gathered and became emotional, expressing their anger at the government's betrayal of the country's interests.This scene further highlights the impact of the treaty signing on society and the discontent of the population through the reaction of the crowd.As the video progresses, the debate between supporters and opponents of Lee Wan Yong becomes more heated.A man in a green shirt sits on a couch and says to the camera, "You've been humiliated, now you have a good reason."This sentence reveals the accusation and dissatisfaction of Li Wanyong.Another commentator stated that the treaty was invalid and illegal because it did not follow any procedures.The video concludes with a historical clip from 1907, when Gojong attempted to seek international support by sending an envoy to the World Peace Conference in The Hague, but was unsuccessful due to Japanese interference.This piece of history not only reflects the helplessness and predicament of Emperor Gaozong, but also further reveals the complex role played by Li Wanyong in the process.Through rich historical footage and character interviews, the entire video vividly illustrates Lee Wan Yong's political career in the complex international situation from the late 19th century to the early 20th century, making the viewer feel as if they were there in the turbulence and change of that era.[00:40:00->00:50:00]The video enters the critical period between 1905 and 1910, when Lee Wan-yong's political career and the situation on the Korean Peninsula became more complex and volatile.The scene begins by showing a woman in a blue shirt sitting on a couch, her expression serious as if she is waiting for an important moment.Subtitles suggest that this is a voting scene about the five people who support the treaty.Her words revealed a heavy sense of mission, "You're going to embarrass me at my own table with this, embarrassment.To embarrass you, to preserve the royal family, to protect the crown.If you want to protect the royal family and save lives, just use."

The camera then switches to a man wearing glasses who sits on a couch and says to the camera, "If you want to protect the royal family and save lives, just use.If you want to view lives, just use.If you want to stay alive, do nothing and stay silent.Do nothing, keep quiet. Do nothing, keep quiet."His tone was full of helplessness and ambivalence, as if he were weighing the pros and cons of each option.A woman in a blue shirt then sat down on the couch, and she continued, "I'd say 'look at the fixtures' or something like that.It would express what I'm sure you would say, yes, so you sold the boat."Her words reveal her dissatisfaction and anger at Li Wanyong's betrayal of the country's interests.The video goes on to show a man in military uniform standing in front of a television screen as he appears to give a speech.The caption reads, "I'm sure you'd say that, yes, so you sold the boat.That's right. That's why we're selling the boat and looking for the best.Best of all, Yi Wanrong reigns supreme."This passage reveals Lee Wanyong's political ambitions and his collusion with Japanese forces.Next, the camera pans to a man wearing glasses, standing in a room that appears to be a library with a watch on the wall.He continued, "Yi Wanrong has unified the world, Yi Wanrong, a powerful man.After overthrowing Gojong, Lee Wan-young now enjoys the right to depose Gojong.There was no longer any roughness to be found for Lee Wanyu, who had deposed Gojong.He's not rude at all, people call him ......" His tone was filled with a complex assessment of Li Wan Yong, with a hint of admiration and a fair amount of criticism.The video also shows a group of men sitting at a table discussing it and they seem to be enjoying their conversation in a relaxed atmosphere.The caption reads, "How do people perceive him? Now it could be that times might be a little crazy right now with all the social media and stuff going on.Social media is a bit crazy.This caused a furor on social media and within South Korea.It's a mess. My country's a mess.It's a mess. Our country's a mess.That's right, I'm sorry."This passage reflects the social controversy and popular discontent over Lee Van Yong at the time.The video continues to progress, showing a man in a green shirt sitting on a couch and telling the camera, "Using the analogy of a dog, he criticizes the walls of his house by using the dog as a metaphor.He criticized the walls of his house with various expletives.All kinds of profanity and with all kinds of profanity and feces.This will be defiled with feces. This is the home of the Yiwan Yong protesters."His words were full of strong dissatisfaction with Li Wanyong, and he even used extremely strong words.The video concludes by showing the October 1909 assassination of Ito Hirobumi in Harbin.A man in glasses stood in front of the microphone and said, "October 1909, Yi Man-yong, the death of Ito, for which Yi Man-yong was saddened, even in mourning."This passage reveals Li Wan-yung's complex feelings after Ito's assassination, both in awe of Japanese power and in concern for his personal fate.As the video progresses, the viewer gradually feels the immense pressure and inner struggle that Li Wanyong faces in the complex political environment.Each of his choices not only affected his personal destiny, but also profoundly influenced the historical direction of the Korean Peninsula.Through rich historical footage and character interviews, the video vividly illustrates the history of this turbulent period, making viewers feel as if they were there, experiencing the turmoil and change of the era.[00:50:00->01:00:00] In this video, the scene gradually shifts to show a series of important facts about Ahn Chong-geun's activities between 1906 and 1907.The video begins by showing a woman in a blue shirt sitting on a couch with a serious expression on her face, as if she is waiting for an important moment.Her words reveal a heavy sense of purpose: "You'll embarrass me and embarrass me at my own table.To protect the royal family and save lives, simply use."

The camera then switches to a man wearing glasses who sits on a couch and says to the camera, "If you want to protect the royal family and save lives, just use.If you want to view lives, just use.If you want to stay alive, do nothing and stay silent."His tone was full of helplessness and ambivalence, as if he were weighing the pros and cons of each option.The scene then shifts to a woman in a blue shirt who continues, "I would say 'look at the fixtures' or something like that.It would express what I'm sure you would say, yes, so you sold the boat."Her words reveal her dissatisfaction and anger at Ahn Chong-geun's betrayal of the country's interests.The video goes on to show a man in military uniform standing in front of a television screen as he appears to give a speech.The caption reads, "I'm sure you'd say that, yes, so you sold the boat.That's right. That's why we're selling the boat and looking for the best.Best of all, Ahn Jung-geun reigns supreme."This passage reveals An Shigeki's political ambitions and his collusion with Japanese forces.Next, the camera pans to a man wearing glasses, standing in a room with a watch on the wall.He continued, "Ahn Jung-geun united the world, Ahn Jung-geun, a man of power.An Jung-geun, who overthrew Gojong, now enjoys the right to depose Gojong after An Jung-geun now enjoys the right to depose Gojong.There's no more roughing it for Ahn Jung-geun, who deposed Gojong.He's not rude at all, people call him ......" His tone was filled with a complex assessment of An Shigekane, with a hint of admiration and a fair amount of criticism.The video also shows a group of men sitting at a table discussing it and they seem to be enjoying their conversation in a relaxed atmosphere.The caption reads, "How do people perceive him? Now it could be that times might be a little crazy right now with all the social media and stuff going on.Social media is a bit crazy.This caused a furor on social media and within South Korea.It's a mess. My country's a mess.It's a mess. Our country's a mess.That's right, I'm sorry."This passage reflects the controversy over An Shigeki in society and the discontent of the people at that time.The video continues to progress, showing a man in a green shirt sitting on a couch and telling the camera, "Using the analogy of a dog, he criticizes the walls of his house by using the dog as a metaphor.He criticized the walls of his house with various expletives.All kinds of profanity and with all kinds of profanity and feces.This will be defiled with feces. This is the home of the An Jung-geun protesters."His words were filled with strong dissatisfaction with Ahn Chong-geun, and he even used extremely strong words.The video concludes by showing the October 1909 assassination of Ito Hirobumi in Harbin.A man in glasses stood in front of the microphone and he said, "October, 1909, Ishogane, Ito's death, for Ito's death, An Shogane felt sadness, even in mourning."This passage reveals An Shigekane's complex feelings after Ito's assassination, which range from awe of Japanese power to concern for his personal fate.As the video progresses, viewers gradually feel the immense pressure and inner struggle that Ahn Chong-geun faces in the complex political environment.Each of his choices not only affected his personal destiny, but also profoundly influenced the historical direction of the Korean Peninsula.Through rich historical footage and character interviews, the video vividly illustrates the history of this turbulent period, making viewers feel as if they were there, experiencing the turmoil and change of the era.[01:00:00->01:10:00] In this video, the scene shifts to a woman in a white shirt sitting on a couch, facing the interviewer.Her words reveal a firm resolve: "Let's get started, overcome the limitations of the domestic anti-Japanese movement and carry out the anti-Japanese struggle in earnest."Her tone is full of hope for the future and determination to fight the war.The video then switches to a scene in a field where a group of people dressed in traditional Korean clothing stand together and appear to be engaged in a serious conversation.Their expressions were serious, as if they were discussing something important.The mountains and fields in the background add a stately atmosphere to the scene.The subtitle reads, "Overcome the limitations of the domestic anti-Japanese movement and carry out the anti-Japanese struggle in earnest and conscientiously resist the Japanese."

Next, the image shows a group of people in traditional dress walking along a dry road with a vast field in the background.They seem to be putting on a historical theater show.Subtitles read: "He left his country to fight the Japanese in good faith."This scene conveys a strong sense of patriotism through the actions of the characters and the background music.The video then shows a man dressed in white standing in a field, smiling and spinning for the camera, with a vast sky and distant mountains in the background.This scene appears to be a propaganda advertisement designed to show An Shigeki's determination and courage.Subtitles read: "He left his country to fight the Japanese in good faith.Out of the country, China and Korea are far from the motherland."

The scene switches again to a man wearing glasses standing in front of a bookshelf, holding a microphone and seemingly giving a speech.His words reveal a sense of determination and contemplation, "So, leaving his family behind, Ahn Jung-geun traveled to ......" The subtitles show, "After leaving his family behind, Ahn Jung-geun traveled to... ... "This scene further demonstrates Ahn Jong-geun's spirit of sacrifice and loyalty to his country through the man's narration.The video then shows a man in a blue shirt sitting on a couch and saying to the camera, "Where is it?" In the background is a window through which the view outside can be seen.This scene hints at the uncertainty and complexity of An Shigeki's departure from his family through the man's question.The video then shows a man in military uniform standing in front of a map, seemingly discussing something related to the Korean War.The subtitles read, "Where?" This scene further emphasizes An Shigeki's strategic thinking and deployment of actions in the resistance through the movements of the men in uniform and the map in the background.The video continues to progress, showing a group of people sitting around a table in a room, seemingly eating together.The caption reads, "It's a matter of collecting [music]."This scene conveys a spirit of solidarity and common struggle through people talking and interacting.The screen then shows a blackboard with Korean text written on it, with no other objects or people in the background.The subtitles show: "Three thousand miles of rivers and mountains were taken by foreigners, and they ended up in such a situation."This scene conveys, through the words on the blackboard, a deep concern for the fate of the nation and anger at the invaders.The video goes on to show a group of people sitting on a couch, talking to each other and seemingly discussing something important.The caption reads, "It's a matter of collecting [music]."This scene further emphasizes the importance of solidarity and resistance through the conversations people have.At the end, the video shows a woman in white sitting on a couch and telling the camera, "Sing in unison and wow the world."In the background is a window through which you can see outside.This scene conveys a sense of hope for the future and a strong belief in the rejuvenation of the country through the women's words and background music.Through rich historical footage and character interviews, the entire video vividly illustrates the challenges and inner struggles that Ahn faced in the complex political environment of the late 19th and early 20th centuries, making the viewer feel as if they were there in the turbulence and change of that era.[01:10:00->01:20:00] The video moves to a pivotal moment in history, showing the October 26, 1909, assassination of Japanese Prime Minister Ito Hirobumi by Shigenori Yasu.The scene begins by showing a group of people waiting on a platform at the Harbin train station, with a slowly approaching train in the background.The clock showed the time as 9:00 a.m., and there was tension and anticipation in the air.A man in a blue shirt sits on a couch and tells the camera, "Four days from now, October 26th is destined to be a deadly day."His words were heavy and troubled.Another man wearing glasses stood in front of the bookshelf, holding a microphone, and explained in detail, "The exact time of Ito Hirobumi's arrival in Harbin was 9 a.m. on October 26th.An Shigekane has been ready for this for a long time."

The scene switches to An Shigeki's preparations.He wore an old suit and held a pistol with a determined look.Subtitles in the video read, "At about 7 a.m., An Shigekane arrived in Harbin, purchased and read a variety of newspapers, and confirmed the arrival time of Ito Hirobumi."The camera shows An Shigeki wandering around the train station, watching every detail.As the train slowly pulled up to the platform, the crowd began to surge.An Shigekane stood in the crowd, his eyes locked on Ito Hirobumi.Subtitles in the video read, "Hiromu Ito boarded the train shortly after he was hit and was found dead in his compartment about half an hour later."

A man in a blue shirt sat in a chair and told the camera, "After the ceremony, Ahn Chong-geun looked up to the sky and shouted, 'Long live the Republic of Korea!'" His tone is filled with admiration for Ahn Chong-geun and a sense of history.Another commentator noted, "An Shigekane did not run away, knowing that he could not possibly escape the encircling gendarmes."

The video goes on to show footage of Ahn Chong-geun after his arrest, being escorted by military police with a calm expression on his face.A woman in a white shirt sits on a couch and tells the camera, "An Shigeki's family must have been very anxious and upset when they heard the news.They were worried about An Shigeki's well-being, but at the same time, they were proud of his heroic behavior."

The scene switches to Lushun Prison in China, where black and white images show the old abandoned building.Subtitles in the video explain, "An Chonggen is being held in Lushun Prison, which is about 900 kilometers from Harbin to Lushun and requires a two-day train ride to get there."

At the end of the video, the frame is fixed on a picture of An Shigeki as the background music fades.A man wearing glasses stood in front of the bookshelf and concluded, "Although Ahn Chong-geun's assassination failed to change the fate of the Korean Peninsula, his heroic act became a legend and inspired countless generations to come."

Through rich historical footage and character interviews, the entire video vividly illustrates Ahn's valor and determination during this tumultuous period, making the viewer feel as if they were there, experiencing the tensions and changes of the era.[01:20:00->01:30:00] The video goes into the trial phase following the assassination of Japanese Prime Minister Ito Hirobumi by An Shigekane, revealing the complex international relations and political games behind this historical event.The scene begins by showing a woman in a white shirt sitting on a couch as she discusses with the interviewer the attribution of Harbin.She mentioned, "I've designated a large area of railroad land around Harbin, so assuming you have ...... what country does Harbin belong to?"

Immediately afterward, a man in a blue shirt sits on a couch and says to the camera, "Which country does Harbin belong to? Which country does Harbin belong to?" He repeats the question as if to emphasize the complexity of Harbin's belonging.The subtitles in the video further explain, "Although this is Chinese land, it is subject to Russian government restrictions, and this is where the Russian government restrictions come into play."

The video clip then shows a map of South Korea with a red dot, which is located in the center of the map and seems to emphasize the location of Harbin.The issue of An Shigeki's trial is complicated by the fact that Harbin, though on Chinese soil, is under the influence of the Russian government," explains a man wearing glasses standing in front of a bookshelf, who further explains."

Next, the video shows a group of people sitting at a table having a discussion, with subtitles showing, "If that's the case, where should An Shigeki be tried? He should be tried by the Russian government."But then the scene switches to a clothed man standing in front of a wooden wall, who continues: 'He should have been tried by the Russian government, and you are now ignoring these international relations.'Now, ignoring these international relations, the Government of Japan has handed over the detention and trial of An Shigeki to the Government of Japan."

The video continues to advance, showing a man in military uniform standing in front of the building, with subtitles that read, "An Shigeki's custody and trial were immediately transferred to the Japanese."A man in a dress then stood in front of the vase as he explained, 'The Russian side responsible for security at Harbin Station announced that they absolved themselves of responsibility for Ito's death.'Thus, Russia, at the behest of Japan, handed over the detention and trial of An Shigeki to the Japanese."

The video goes on to show An's detention in Lushun Prison.A woman in a white shirt sits on a couch and says to the camera, "Ahn Chong-geun is being held in a prison in Lushun, China.After the Russo-Japanese War, the Lushun area was occupied by Japan."Then a man wearing glasses stood in front of the bookshelf and further explained: "In the Lushun area, An Shigeki will be tried by a Japanese judge, a Japanese prosecutor and a Japanese defense lawyer."

The video then shows the first public trial on February 7, 1910, for An Shigeki.A man in a dress stood in front of a green screen as he explained, "And so it was that on February 7, 1910, the first public trial of An Shigeki was finally held.More than 500 spectators flocked to the courthouse at the crack of dawn, and the place was buzzing with activity."

In court, a Japanese judge asked Ahn why he shot Ito, and Ahn replied bluntly, "I am a Korean who fought in the War of Independence as a military doctor and killed Ito."This answer set the tone of the trial.In the video, a woman sits on a couch and says to the camera, "This trial is not only a judicial process, it's a political game."

The video goes on to show An Shigeki's performance at the trial and the ideas he put forward in the Eastern Peace Theory.A man wearing glasses stood in front of the bookshelf and explained, "An Shigekane's Theory of Peace in the East proposed the establishment of a community of three nations that would cooperate on an equal footing, an idea that was very advanced at the time."

Ultimately, the video shows An Chonggen being executed in Lushun Prison on March 26, 1910, as heavy rain pours down.A woman sits on a couch and says to the camera, "The end of life, on this day, March 26, Ahn Chong-geun was photographed in prison, and the images were filled with a sad atmosphere."

Through rich historical footage and character interviews, the entire video vividly demonstrates the trial process of An Shigekane after his assassination of Ito Hirobumi, as well as the strong beliefs and noble sentiments he demonstrated during the process, making the viewer feel as if they were in the turbulence and change of that era.[01:30:00->01:40:00] In this video, the footage gradually unveils the last moments of Ahn Chong-geun's life and his deep love for his family and his country as the different characters reminisce and narrate.The video begins by showing a man in a blue shirt sitting in a chair who appears to be discussing An Shigeki's final moments with the interviewer, with the caption reading, "Let's take a look at a picture of the appearance of the middle deltoid muscle and let's check it out."This seems to be a metaphor for An Shigeki's physical condition, suggesting his mental and physical toughness.The scene then switches to a man dressed in white sitting in a chair with a black background as he appears to be meditating, with music playing slowly in the background, creating a serene and heavy atmosphere.Subtitles read: "Let's see, let's see."This scene conveys a contemplation of history and a tribute to An Shigeki through the silence of the men and the music in the background.The video then shows a group of people sitting at a table having a conversation, and they seem to be discussing An Shigeki's mood.Subtitles read: "How is Ahn Jung-geun feeling at this point? How is it? If, but the expression is, the facial expression should be confident and full of confidence."This scene reflects An's firmness and confidence in facing the trial through the characters' dialog.The scene then switches to a man in a black shirt who appears to be in the middle of a serious conversation.The caption reads, "It's just one of those days where you just kind of let yourself go and.This is one of those days where I'd rather just let it all go and then have a day where I'd rather just let myself go and relax and get comfortable."This conversation reveals An's internal struggle in his final moments through the words of the man, who is facing the death penalty but still wishes to maintain his inner peace.Next, the video shows a man wearing glasses standing in front of a bookshelf, who is talking to the camera and pointing to a photo.The caption reads, "I see acceptance in your eyes. I can see that you've accepted it, and so have I.I've seen this photo many times, but I don't really think about it."This scene conveys, through the man's narration, a profound reflection on An Shigeki's final moments and a reverence for history.The video continues to progress, showing a woman in a white shirt sitting on a couch, talking to the camera.The caption reads, "I think that partly explains my determination to face this situation."This scene reflects, through the words of the women, An Shigeki's strong conviction in the face of concerns about the future of the country.The scene then shows a clothed man standing in front of a bookshelf, who appears to be discussing Ahn Chong-geun's last wishes.The caption reads, "Until the end, you may still be worried about the future of your country, or you may have gone through a grueling journey before you were able to or are retracing your steps and reflecting on the journey you have taken.It may be a shame, but there's no doubt that Anju is 32 years old."This narrative conveys, through the man's narration, the complexity of An's feelings and his deep attachment to his country on his deathbed.The video also features a discussion of Ahn Chong-geun's last wishes and will, with subtitles showing, "On his deathbed, he left a will to his two younger siblings.After death Harbin my bones, after I die, my bones will be buried next to Harbin Park, our nationality will be, we can't just bury it in the park and hopefully our sovereignty is restored."This scene reflects, through An Chong-geun's last wish, that even in the last moments of his life, he did not give up hope for the independence of his country.The video concludes by showing a black-and-white photo of Ahn Chong-geun with his family, with music fading in the background and subtitles reading, "By the way, this photo has a death row inmate."This scene conveys a deep nostalgia for Ahn Chong-geun and a heavy sense of history through the photographs and background music.Through rich historical footage and character interviews, the entire video vividly shows An's inner world on his deathbed and his deep thoughts about the future of the country, making the viewer feel as if they were there, experiencing the turmoil and change of that era.

Question: Why was Lee Wanyu able to get rehired?

Choices:
A. Lee Wanyu had strong political connections within the company, which allowed him to bypass the usual hiring procedures and secure his position quickly.
B. Lee Wanyu's previous role involved managing critical projects in Europe, and the company needed someone with his specific expertise to expand their operations there.
C. Lee Wanyu was rehired because he had developed a unique skill set in digital transformation, which was crucial for the company's new strategic direction in technology.
D. Lee Wanyu worked in the United States for a long time and accumulated a lot of important work experience, and Gaozong wanted to get rid of the interference of the powers familiar with the situation in the United States, Lee Wanyu, undoubtedly, is a highly needed talent. Therefore, he was reused.

Answer: D

Lee Wanyu worked in the United States for a long time and accumulated a lot of important work experience, and Gaozong wanted to get rid of the interference of the powers familiar with the situation in the United States, Lee Wanyu, undoubtedly, is a highly needed talent. Therefore, he was reused.

The moderator mentioned that Lee finished using him to obtain a higher position. For about the next two years, he worked in the U.S. engineering offices abroad as the agent in charge. [00:00:59->00:01:00]

The hosts tell the story of Lee Wanyu's return to Korea from his acting engineering position. This experience in the U.S. revolutionized his life. He became a central figure in diplomacy and a representative of the pro-American faction. Lee served in the Seongjungwon, Gojong's central office, which is now the equivalent of the presidential secretariat. [00:02:10->00:02:20]

For Gaozong, who wanted to get rid of the interference of the great powers, Lee Wanyu, who was familiar with the situation in the United States, was undoubtedly a talent that was extremely needed. So he was reused [00:02:50->00:03:00].

Question: Why Korea fell completely into Japan's sphere of influence.

Choices:
A. Internal political instability in Korea weakened its government, and Japan exploited this by orchestrating a series of coups to take control.
B. The Korean monarchy voluntarily ceded control to Japan in exchange for economic aid, and Japan established a permanent military presence in Seoul.
C. Neither Russia nor the United States could support Korea any longer, and Gojong's beloved ministers were suddenly kidnapped by Japan, and Yi Wanyu secretly defected to Japan. So Korea completely fell into Japan's sphere of influence.
D. Korea's military alliances with European powers collapsed, and Japan successfully negotiated exclusive trade agreements with Korean leaders, leading to complete dominance.

Answer: C

Neither Russia nor the United States could support Korea any longer, and Gojong's beloved ministers were suddenly kidnapped by Japan, and Yi Wanyu secretly defected to Japan. So Korea completely fell into Japan's sphere of influence.

After the Sino-Japanese War, Japan's aggressive ambitions toward Korea grew, and Gojong recalled the deposed Yi Wanyu to try to rely on Russia as a counterweight to Japan. [00:14:00->00:15:00]

In September 1905, the Russo-Japanese War ended in Japan's favor. Korea completely fell into Japan's sphere of influence [00:18:15->00:18:20]

In order to salvage the situation, King Kojong mobilized the forces around him and sought support from the United States. However, under such circumstances, the United States changed its position and supported Japan instead. Thus, the situation was completely reversed in favor of Japan. Gojong's trusted ministers were also suddenly kidnapped by Japan, and Lee Wan-young also secretly defected to Japan. So Korea completely fell into Japan's sphere of influence. [00:18:44->00:20:45]

Question: What kind of person is Lee Wanyu?

Choices:
A. The fact that Lee Wan Yu only defers to different state powers differently as the situation changes to protect his power and is involved in incidents of embezzlement shows that he is a follower, greedy, and disloyal person.
B. Lee Wan Yu consistently upholds ethical principles and demonstrates unwavering loyalty to his superiors, even in challenging political environments.
C. Lee Wan Yu prioritizes public service and transparency, actively working to root out corruption and promote accountability in government.
D. Lee Wan Yu is known for his independent decision-making and refusal to compromise his values, regardless of external pressures or power dynamics.

Answer: A

The fact that Lee Wan Yu only defers to different state powers differently as the situation changes to protect his power and is involved in incidents of embezzlement shows that he is a follower, greedy, and disloyal person.

After the Sino-Japanese War, Japan did not let go of Korea, which was trying to fight against Japan with the power of the Great Powers. The Japanese army massacred King Gojong in Gyeongbokgung Palace and put him under house arrest, and in order to salvage his political position, Yi Wanyu made acquaintance with people close to the United States and Russia, and borrowed the power of the Great Powers in order to save King Gojong at any cost. Lee Wan-young was both pro-American and pro-Russian. [00:00:00->00:09:28]

According to the report, in 1895, when he was the Minister of Education (equivalent to the present Minister of Education), the country borrowed money from foreign countries during the difficult times, but he swallowed part of it; in 1896, when he was the Minister of Foreign Affairs (equivalent to the present Minister of Foreign Affairs), he accepted a bribe of 50,000 US dollars from the United States, and also surrendered the right to lay railroads to the United States; in 1898, Yi Wanyu, who had just been appointed as the Procurator-General, was investigated for the suspected embezzlement of 200,000 taels of taxes. In 1898, Li Wanyu, who had just been appointed as an inspector-general, was investigated for allegedly embezzling 200,000 taels of taxes. [00:11:00->00:12:34]

After the Sino-Japanese War, Japan's aggressive ambitions toward Korea grew, and in September 1905, the Russo-Japanese War ended in Japan's favor. From then on, the Korean Empire fell into Japan's sphere of influence. Thus, the situation was completely reversed in favor of Japan. Lee secretly asked Lee Ha-young, the former Minister of Justice, who had defected to Japan, to help him get a position in the Japanese Embassy, and Lee became a pro-Japanese again. [00:14:00->00:20:45]

Question: As Japan's power grew stronger Japan's special guest Prime Minister, Ito Hirobumi, wanted to control Korea through the Treaty of Ethanum. What would have happened if Korea had signed this humiliating treaty?

Choices:
A. As a result, Korea lost its basic rights as an independent nation, and Japan further tightened its control over the Korean economy through the treaty, leading to a sharp decline in the living standards of the Korean people and socio-economic hardship.
B. The treaty would have granted Japan limited trade privileges in Korea, but Korea would have maintained full control over its domestic and foreign policies.
C. Japan would have provided economic aid to Korea, leading to improved infrastructure and a temporary boost in the Korean economy, but at the cost of political influence.
D. Korea would have retained its sovereignty but allowed Japan to establish military bases, which would have led to increased tensions with neighboring countries.

Answer: A

As a result, Korea lost its basic rights as an independent nation, and Japan further tightened its control over the Korean economy through the treaty, leading to a sharp decline in the living standards of the Korean people and socio-economic hardship.

The treaty stipulated that the Korean Empire was to entrust Japan with full diplomatic power, and that Japan was to set up a government office in Seoul to supervise and direct Korea's diplomatic and other affairs on behalf of the Japanese government. This meant that Korea effectively became a Japanese protectorate.

This could lead to a serious undermining of the country's sovereignty and independence, the loss of its fundamental rights as an independent State, and a decline in its international standing.

Japan further strengthened its control over the Korean economy through the treaty, and important areas of the Korean economy, such as the right to build railroads and the right to mine, gradually came under Japanese control.

As Japanese capital poured into Korea and plundered its resources and wealth, Korea's national industry was severely squeezed, economic development was greatly hindered, the Korean people's living standards plummeted, and the society and economy were in dire straits.

Question: Why was the Treaty of Yixi signed in the end?

Choices:
A. Gojong voluntarily agreed to the terms to secure Japanese support against Russian influence in the region.
B. The Korean ministers negotiated favorable terms independently, leading to the signing without external pressure.
C. A diplomatic compromise was reached after prolonged discussions between Japan and Korea, ensuring mutual benefits.
D. Ito Hirobumi, sensing Gojong's intention to delay, used coercion to force the Korean ministers to sign the Treaty of Yessi with Lee Wan-young.

Answer: D

Ito Hirobumi, sensing Gojong's intention to delay, used coercion to force the Korean ministers to sign the Treaty of Yessi with Lee Wan-young.

The Korean minister's resolution to refuse the signing is learned by Ito Hirobumi, and Gojong tries to delay the signing as well, under the pretext that he is not feeling well [00:23:00->00:24:59]

Ito Hirobumi, sensing the intention of King Gojong, decided to settle the matter within the period from 17th to 27th, and he gathered the leading ministers of Joseon already at the Jongmyo Hall. The scene was covered with bayonets, heavily guarded, and some soldiers were deployed inside the palace, trying to force them to ratify the treaty in this atmosphere of saber rattling. [00:25:15->00:26:42]

Lee Wanyu, a pro-Japanese at the time, said, "We are too weak to refuse Japan's demands. It would be wise to sign the treaty." Lee Wan-young's answer was exactly what Ito Hirobumi wanted. Lee's strong support eventually made the other three ministers vote in favor of the treaty under the influence of this atmosphere. In the end, 5 of the 8 ministers present voted in favor of the treaty. So the treaty was signed [00:27:00->00:30:32]

Question: What were the implications of the signing of the Treaty of Ysumi?

Choices:
A. It resulted in Japan forming a defensive alliance with Western powers, limiting its expansionist policies in the region.
B. It led to Japan's isolation from international affairs, reducing its military ambitions and focusing on domestic economic reforms.
C. It triggered a series of internal political reforms in Japan, shifting power from the military to civilian leadership.
D. It allowed Japan to gain more influence in East Asia, and the militaristic forces within Japan became more aggressive, and Japan began to play a dominant role in East Asia.

Answer: D

It allowed Japan to gain more influence in East Asia, and the militaristic forces within Japan became more aggressive, and Japan began to play a dominant role in East Asia.

Japan caused Korea to sign the Treaty of Yessi through strong-arm tactics, which aroused the displeasure of Ahn Jung-hee and caused the assassination of Fujihiro in Harbin. [00:27:00->00:45:00]

The Treaty of Yisi was an important achievement of Japan's foreign expansion policy, marking a crucial step on the road to the annexation of the Korean Peninsula, providing a strategic base and springboard for Japan's further aggression against northeastern China and the rest of Asia, and enhancing Japan's political, military and economic influence in the East Asian region.

The signing of the Treaty made the militarist forces in Japan more arrogant and further inflated their aggressive ambitions. The Japanese Government and military became more convinced of the path of expansion by force and stepped up the mobilization of domestic resources and the expansion of military forces, laying the groundwork for a later war of aggression on a larger scale.

The treaty broke the original balance of power in East Asia, and Japan's position in East Asia rose rapidly and became a regional power. The Korean Peninsula was turned into a Japanese protectorate, the traditional Sino-Chinese clan relationship was completely ended, China's influence in East Asia was seriously weakened, and the political pattern of East Asia underwent a major change, with Japan beginning to play a dominant role in East Asia.

Question: What is the subject matter of this video?

Choices:
A. It analyzes the military strategies employed during the Korean War and their consequences for the peninsula's division.
B. It focuses on what happened to two historical figures, Ahn Jung-hee and Lee Wan-young, in Korea's modern history, and their impact on the political situation of the time.
C. It examines the economic policies implemented during the Joseon Dynasty and their long-term effects on Korea's development.
D. It explores the cultural exchange between Korea and Japan during the early 20th century and its influence on Korean art.

Answer: B

It focuses on what happened to two historical figures, Ahn Jung-hee and Lee Wan-young, in Korea's modern history, and their impact on the political situation of the time.