Poor competency in style steering/following

#44
by sumiremelody - opened

Using GLM-5.2 for agentic programming tasks, I find that it often defaults to using weird sentence constructions that either:

  • feel more appropriate for old literature rather than software engineering.
  • feel like marketing buzzwords

Examples:

  • I see the shape of the problem now
  • Alright, I've recertified the contract
  • This is a greenfield build
  • It speaks the standard foo() shape
  • Separation makes the design legible
  • Now create the recipe and run it

These are annoying on their own as they break from the de facto standard technical style — but they are liabilities in that they obfuscate the work being done by the model. It is also harder to interpret the model's behavior and prompt it accordingly.

It is difficult to prompt this out of the model with a system prompt. In-context steering produced the best results but the model will often find different words/constructs that echo the same underlying problematic behavior or will return to its default behavior after several more turns.

In a creative writing context—specifically requests for short stories—it does a poor job at following demonstrations of a desired style (human-written literary work) with it presenting the same problematic behavior described above.

Please introduce style constraint following, especially in multi-turn, as part of your reinforcement learning gym. Thanks.

Sign up or log in to comment